TY - JOUR
T1 - Corneal endothelial safety profile in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery
AU - Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
AU - Sheybani, Arsham
AU - De Francesco, Ticiana
AU - Samuelson, Thomas W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/4/1
Y1 - 2024/4/1
N2 - Purpose:To compare 5-year corneal endothelial safety of 3 minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices (iStent inject, Hydrus Microstent, CyPass Micro-Stent).Setting:U.S. multicenter trials.Design:Post hoc 5-year analysis from prospective randomized single-masked pivotal trials.Methods:Mild to moderate open-Angle glaucoma subjects received a MIGS implant with phacoemulsification (implant + phaco) or phaco alone (control). In addition, 5-year end points comparing the implant and control groups included proportion of eyes with significant endothelial cell loss (ECL) (>30% or ≥30% vs baseline) and mean endothelial cell density (ECD).Results:Comparable proportions of eyes in the iStent inject + phaco and control groups had significant 60-month ECL (9.4% vs 6.3%, respectively, diff: 3.2%, 95% CI,-5.0% to 11.3%, P =.77). Hydrus (20.8% vs 10.6%, diff: 10.2%, 95% CI, 3.2% to 17.2%, P =.01) and CyPass (27.2% vs 10.0%, diff: 17.2%, 95% CI, 5.6% to 28.7%, P =.02) had more eyes with ECL vs controls (iStent inject 1.49X, Hydrus 1.96X, CyPass 2.72X vs controls). Mean ECD over 60 months for iStent inject was indistinguishable vs control, whereas greater ECL was observed primarily 3 months postoperative (Hydrus) or accelerated after 2 years (CyPass). No iStent inject or Hydrus subjects developed persistent corneal edema, whereas 7 CyPass-implanted eyes developed ECL-related complications.Conclusions:Through 5 years postoperative, there were no differences in proportion of eyes with significant ECL or mean ECD between the iStent inject and control groups. There was greater 5-year ECL and lower ECD in the Hydrus and CyPass groups vs controls. The Hydrus ECL rate mirrored control after 3 months; the CyPass ECL rate accelerated vs control.
AB - Purpose:To compare 5-year corneal endothelial safety of 3 minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices (iStent inject, Hydrus Microstent, CyPass Micro-Stent).Setting:U.S. multicenter trials.Design:Post hoc 5-year analysis from prospective randomized single-masked pivotal trials.Methods:Mild to moderate open-Angle glaucoma subjects received a MIGS implant with phacoemulsification (implant + phaco) or phaco alone (control). In addition, 5-year end points comparing the implant and control groups included proportion of eyes with significant endothelial cell loss (ECL) (>30% or ≥30% vs baseline) and mean endothelial cell density (ECD).Results:Comparable proportions of eyes in the iStent inject + phaco and control groups had significant 60-month ECL (9.4% vs 6.3%, respectively, diff: 3.2%, 95% CI,-5.0% to 11.3%, P =.77). Hydrus (20.8% vs 10.6%, diff: 10.2%, 95% CI, 3.2% to 17.2%, P =.01) and CyPass (27.2% vs 10.0%, diff: 17.2%, 95% CI, 5.6% to 28.7%, P =.02) had more eyes with ECL vs controls (iStent inject 1.49X, Hydrus 1.96X, CyPass 2.72X vs controls). Mean ECD over 60 months for iStent inject was indistinguishable vs control, whereas greater ECL was observed primarily 3 months postoperative (Hydrus) or accelerated after 2 years (CyPass). No iStent inject or Hydrus subjects developed persistent corneal edema, whereas 7 CyPass-implanted eyes developed ECL-related complications.Conclusions:Through 5 years postoperative, there were no differences in proportion of eyes with significant ECL or mean ECD between the iStent inject and control groups. There was greater 5-year ECL and lower ECD in the Hydrus and CyPass groups vs controls. The Hydrus ECL rate mirrored control after 3 months; the CyPass ECL rate accelerated vs control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188794445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001365
DO - 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001365
M3 - Article
C2 - 37988037
AN - SCOPUS:85188794445
SN - 0886-3350
VL - 50
SP - 369
EP - 377
JO - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
JF - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
IS - 4
ER -