TY - JOUR
T1 - Core Competencies for Undergraduates in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering
T2 - Findings, Consequences, and Recommendations
AU - White, John A.
AU - Gaver, Donald P.
AU - Butera, Robert J.
AU - Choi, Bernard
AU - Dunlop, Mary J.
AU - Grande-Allen, K. Jane
AU - Grosberg, Anna
AU - Hitchcock, Robert W.
AU - Huang-Saad, Aileen Y.
AU - Kotche, Miiri
AU - Kyle, Aaron M.
AU - Lerner, Amy L.
AU - Linehan, John H.
AU - Linsenmeier, Robert A.
AU - Miller, Michael I.
AU - Papin, Jason A.
AU - Setton, Lori
AU - Sgro, Allyson
AU - Smith, Michael L.
AU - Zaman, Muhammad
AU - Lee, Abraham P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Biomedical Engineering Society.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - This paper provides a synopsis of discussions related to biomedical engineering core curricula that occurred at the Fourth BME Education Summit held at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio in May 2019. This summit was organized by the Council of Chairs of Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering, and participants included over 300 faculty members from 100+ accredited undergraduate programs. This discussion focused on six key questions: QI: Is there a core curriculum, and if so, what are its components? QII: How does our purported core curriculum prepare students for careers, particularly in industry? QIII: How does design distinguish BME/BIOE graduates from other engineers? QIV: What is the state of engineering analysis and systems-level modeling in BME/BIOE curricula? QV: What is the role of data science in BME/BIOE undergraduate education? QVI: What core experimental skills are required for BME/BIOE undergrads? s. Indeed, BME/BIOI core curricula exists and has matured to emphasize interdisciplinary topics such as physiology, instrumentation, mechanics, computer programming, and mathematical modeling. Departments demonstrate their own identities by highlighting discipline-specific sub-specialties. In addition to technical competence, Industry partners most highly value our students’ capacity for problem solving and communication. As such, BME/BIOE curricula includes open-ended projects that address unmet patient and clinician needs as primary methods to prepare graduates for careers in industry. Culminating senior design experiences distinguish BME/BIOE graduates through their development of client-centered engineering solutions to healthcare problems. Finally, the overall BME/BIOE curriculum is not stagnant—it is clear that data science will become an ever-important element of our students’ training and that new methods to enhance student engagement will be of pedagogical importance as we embark on the next decade.
AB - This paper provides a synopsis of discussions related to biomedical engineering core curricula that occurred at the Fourth BME Education Summit held at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio in May 2019. This summit was organized by the Council of Chairs of Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering, and participants included over 300 faculty members from 100+ accredited undergraduate programs. This discussion focused on six key questions: QI: Is there a core curriculum, and if so, what are its components? QII: How does our purported core curriculum prepare students for careers, particularly in industry? QIII: How does design distinguish BME/BIOE graduates from other engineers? QIV: What is the state of engineering analysis and systems-level modeling in BME/BIOE curricula? QV: What is the role of data science in BME/BIOE undergraduate education? QVI: What core experimental skills are required for BME/BIOE undergrads? s. Indeed, BME/BIOI core curricula exists and has matured to emphasize interdisciplinary topics such as physiology, instrumentation, mechanics, computer programming, and mathematical modeling. Departments demonstrate their own identities by highlighting discipline-specific sub-specialties. In addition to technical competence, Industry partners most highly value our students’ capacity for problem solving and communication. As such, BME/BIOE curricula includes open-ended projects that address unmet patient and clinician needs as primary methods to prepare graduates for careers in industry. Culminating senior design experiences distinguish BME/BIOE graduates through their development of client-centered engineering solutions to healthcare problems. Finally, the overall BME/BIOE curriculum is not stagnant—it is clear that data science will become an ever-important element of our students’ training and that new methods to enhance student engagement will be of pedagogical importance as we embark on the next decade.
KW - Biomedical Engineering Curriculum
KW - Biomedical Engineering Design
KW - Biomedical Engineering Education
KW - Biomedical Engineering Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079145877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10439-020-02468-2
DO - 10.1007/s10439-020-02468-2
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 32026231
AN - SCOPUS:85079145877
SN - 0090-6964
VL - 48
SP - 905
EP - 912
JO - Annals of biomedical engineering
JF - Annals of biomedical engineering
IS - 3
ER -