TY - JOUR
T1 - Convection in containerless processing
AU - Hyers, Robert W.
AU - Matson, Douglas M.
AU - Kelton, Kenneth F.
AU - Rogers, Jan R.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Different containerless processing techniques have different strengths and weaknesses. Applying more than one technique allows various parts of a problem to be solved separately. For two research projects, one on phase selection in steels and the other on nucleation and growth of quasicrystals, a combination of experiments using electrostatic levitation (ESL) and electromagnetic levitation (EML) is appropriate. In both experiments, convection is an important variable. The convective conditions achievable with each method are compared for two very different materials: a low-viscosity, high-temperature stainless steel, and a high-viscosity, low-temperature quasicrystal-forming alloy. It is clear that the techniques are complementary when convection is a parameter to be explored in the experiments. For a number of reasons, including the sample size, temperature, and reactivity, direct measurement of the convective velocity is not feasible. Therefore, we must rely on computation techniques to estimate convection in these experiments. These models are an essential part of almost any microgravity investigation. The methods employed and results obtained for the projects levitation observation of dendrite evolution in steel ternary alloy rapid solidification (LODESTARS) and quasicrystalline undercooled alloys for space investigation (QUASI) are explained.
AB - Different containerless processing techniques have different strengths and weaknesses. Applying more than one technique allows various parts of a problem to be solved separately. For two research projects, one on phase selection in steels and the other on nucleation and growth of quasicrystals, a combination of experiments using electrostatic levitation (ESL) and electromagnetic levitation (EML) is appropriate. In both experiments, convection is an important variable. The convective conditions achievable with each method are compared for two very different materials: a low-viscosity, high-temperature stainless steel, and a high-viscosity, low-temperature quasicrystal-forming alloy. It is clear that the techniques are complementary when convection is a parameter to be explored in the experiments. For a number of reasons, including the sample size, temperature, and reactivity, direct measurement of the convective velocity is not feasible. Therefore, we must rely on computation techniques to estimate convection in these experiments. These models are an essential part of almost any microgravity investigation. The methods employed and results obtained for the projects levitation observation of dendrite evolution in steel ternary alloy rapid solidification (LODESTARS) and quasicrystalline undercooled alloys for space investigation (QUASI) are explained.
KW - Containerless processing
KW - Convection
KW - Electromagnetic levitation
KW - Electrostatic levitation
KW - Quasicrystals
KW - Stainless steel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10644272372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1196/annals.1324.038
DO - 10.1196/annals.1324.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 15644376
AN - SCOPUS:10644272372
SN - 0077-8923
VL - 1027
SP - 474
EP - 494
JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
ER -