Continuous negative abdominal pressure reduces ventilator-induced lung injury in a porcine model

Takeshi Yoshida, Doreen Engelberts, Gail Otulakowski, Bhushan Katira, Martin Post, Niall D. Ferguson, Laurent Brochard, Marcelo B.P. Amato, Brian P. Kavanagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In supine patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the lung typically partitions into regions of dorsal atelectasis and ventral aeration (“baby lung”). Positive airway pressure is often used to recruit atelectasis, but often overinflates ventral (already aerated) regions. A novel approach to selective recruitment of dorsal atelectasis is by “continuous negative abdominal pressure.” Methods: A randomized laboratory study was performed in anesthetized pigs. Lung injury was induced by surfactant lavage followed by 1 h of injurious mechanical ventilation. Randomization (five pigs in each group) was to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) alone or PEEP with continuous negative abdominal pressure (−5 cm H2O via a plexiglass chamber enclosing hindlimbs, pelvis, and abdomen), followed by 4 h of injurious ventilation (high tidal volume, 20 ml/kg; low expiratory transpulmonary pressure, −3 cm H2O). The level of PEEP at the start was ≈7 (vs. ≈3) cm H2O in the PEEP (vs. PEEP plus continuous negative abdominal pressure) groups. Esophageal pressure, hemodynamics, and electrical impedance tomography were recorded, and injury determined by lung wet/dry weight ratio and interleukin-6 expression. Results: All animals survived, but cardiac output was decreased in the PEEP group. Addition of continuous negative abdominal pressure to PEEP resulted in greater oxygenation (PaO2/fractional inspired oxygen 316 ± 134 vs. 80 ± 24 mmHg at 4 h, P = 0.005), compliance (14.2 ± 3.0 vs. 10.3 ± 2.2 ml/cm H2O, P = 0.049), and homogeneity of ventilation, with less pulmonary edema (≈10% less) and interleukin-6 expression (≈30% less). Conclusions: Continuous negative abdominal pressure added to PEEP reduces ventilator-induced lung injury in a pig model compared with PEEP alone, despite targeting identical expiratory transpulmonary pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-172
Number of pages10
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous negative abdominal pressure reduces ventilator-induced lung injury in a porcine model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this