TY - JOUR
T1 - Considerations for MRI study design and implementation in pediatric and clinical populations
AU - Greene, Deanna J.
AU - Black, Kevin J.
AU - Schlaggar, Bradley L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors.
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - Human neuroimaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is being used with increasing popularity to study brain structure and function in development and disease. When applying these methods to developmental and clinical populations, careful consideration must be taken with regard to study design and implementation. In this article, we discuss two major considerations particularly pertinent to brain research in special populations. First, we discuss considerations for subject selection and characterization, including issues related to comorbid conditions, medication status, and clinical assessment. Second, we discuss methods and considerations for acquisition of adequate, useable MRI data. Given that children and patients may experience anxiety with the scanner environment, preventing participation, and that they have a higher risk of motion artifact, resulting in data loss, successful subject compliance and data acquisition are not trivial tasks. We conclude that, as researchers, we must consider a number of issues when using neuroimaging tools to study children and patients, and we should thoughtfully justify our choices of methods and study design.
AB - Human neuroimaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is being used with increasing popularity to study brain structure and function in development and disease. When applying these methods to developmental and clinical populations, careful consideration must be taken with regard to study design and implementation. In this article, we discuss two major considerations particularly pertinent to brain research in special populations. First, we discuss considerations for subject selection and characterization, including issues related to comorbid conditions, medication status, and clinical assessment. Second, we discuss methods and considerations for acquisition of adequate, useable MRI data. Given that children and patients may experience anxiety with the scanner environment, preventing participation, and that they have a higher risk of motion artifact, resulting in data loss, successful subject compliance and data acquisition are not trivial tasks. We conclude that, as researchers, we must consider a number of issues when using neuroimaging tools to study children and patients, and we should thoughtfully justify our choices of methods and study design.
KW - Development
KW - Inclusion/exclusion criteria
KW - Mock scanner
KW - Motion artifact
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - Neuropsychiatric disorders
KW - Tourette syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952333738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.005
DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 26754461
AN - SCOPUS:84952333738
SN - 1878-9293
VL - 18
SP - 101
EP - 112
JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
ER -