Abstract
Intravenous fluids (IVFs) represent a basic therapeutic intervention utilized in septic shock. Unfortunately, the optimal method for administering IVFs to maximize patient outcomes is unknown. A meta-analysis of four randomized trials of goal-directed therapy did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio 0.609; 95% confidence interval 0.363 to 1.020; P = 0.059), whereas 18 trials with historical controls showed a significant increase in survival (odds ratio 0.580; 95% confidence interval 0.501 to 0.672; P < 0.0001). Based on these data, clinicians should be aware of the potential for harm due to the excessive administration of IVFs to patients with septic shock.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 481 |
| Journal | Critical Care |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 29 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative fluid therapy in septic shock: An example of targeted therapeutic minimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver