TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Conference on North American Training in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery
T2 - A Review of the Conference and Presentation of Consensus Statements
AU - Jeyarajah, D. Rohan
AU - Berman, Russell S.
AU - Doyle, Majella
AU - Geevarghese, Sunil K.
AU - Posner, Mitchell C.
AU - Farmer, Douglas
AU - Minter, Rebecca M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - The findings and recommendations of the North American Consensus Conference on Training in HPB Surgery held October 2014 are presented. The conference was hosted by the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO), Americas Hepatopancreaticobiliary Association (AHPBA), and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS). The current state of training in HPB surgery in North America was defined through three pathways—HPB, Surgical Oncology, and Solid Organ Transplant fellowships. Consensus regarding programmatic requirements included establishment of minimum case volumes and inclusion of quality metrics. Formative assessment, using milestones as a framework and inclusive of both operative and non-operative skills, must be present. Specific core HPB cases should be defined and used for evaluation of operative skills. The conference concluded with a focus on the optimal means to perform summative assessment to evaluate the individual fellow completing a fellowship in HPB surgery. Presentations from the hospital perspective and the American Board of Surgery led to consensus that summative assessment was desired by the public and the hospital systems, and should occur in a uniform but possibly modular manner for all HPB fellowship pathways. A task force comprised of representatives of the SSO, AHPBA, and ASTS are charged with implementation of the consensus statements emanating from this consensus conference.
AB - The findings and recommendations of the North American Consensus Conference on Training in HPB Surgery held October 2014 are presented. The conference was hosted by the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO), Americas Hepatopancreaticobiliary Association (AHPBA), and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS). The current state of training in HPB surgery in North America was defined through three pathways—HPB, Surgical Oncology, and Solid Organ Transplant fellowships. Consensus regarding programmatic requirements included establishment of minimum case volumes and inclusion of quality metrics. Formative assessment, using milestones as a framework and inclusive of both operative and non-operative skills, must be present. Specific core HPB cases should be defined and used for evaluation of operative skills. The conference concluded with a focus on the optimal means to perform summative assessment to evaluate the individual fellow completing a fellowship in HPB surgery. Presentations from the hospital perspective and the American Board of Surgery led to consensus that summative assessment was desired by the public and the hospital systems, and should occur in a uniform but possibly modular manner for all HPB fellowship pathways. A task force comprised of representatives of the SSO, AHPBA, and ASTS are charged with implementation of the consensus statements emanating from this consensus conference.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959346831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-016-5111-9
DO - 10.1245/s10434-016-5111-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 26932708
AN - SCOPUS:84959346831
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 23
SP - 2153
EP - 2160
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -