Confirming a Historical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Challenges and Recommendations

Andrew J. Solomon, Georgina Arrambide, Wallace Brownlee, Anne H. Cross, María I. Gaitan, Fred D. Lublin, Naila Makhani, Ellen M. Mowry, Daniel S. Reich, Àlex Rovira, Brian G. Weinshenker, Jeffrey A. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Patients with a historical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) - a patient presenting with a diagnosis of MS made previously and by a different clinician - present specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical practice. Application of the McDonald criteria is most straightforward when applied contemporaneously with a syndrome typical of an MS attack or relapse; however, retrospective application of the criteria in some patients with a historical diagnosis of MS can be problematic. Limited patient recollection of symptoms and evolution of neurologic examination and MRI findings complicate confirmation of an earlier MS diagnosis and assessment of subsequent disease activity or clinical progression. Adequate records for review of prior clinical examinations, laboratory results, and/or MRI scans obtained at the time of diagnosis or during ensuing care may be inadequate or unavailable. This article provides recommendations for a clinical approach to the evaluation of patients with a historical diagnosis of MS to aid diagnostic confirmation, avoid misdiagnosis, and inform therapeutic decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-269
Number of pages7
JournalNeurology: Clinical Practice
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confirming a Historical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Challenges and Recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this