TY - JOUR
T1 - Computed tomography calcium score scan for attenuation correction of N-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography
T2 - Effect of respiratory phase and registration method
AU - Zaidi, Habib
AU - Nkoulou, Rene
AU - Bond, Sarah
AU - Baskin, Aylin
AU - Schindler, Thomas
AU - Ratib, Osman
AU - Declerck, Jerome
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant SNSF 31003A-135576 and Geneva University Hospital under grant PRD-11-II-1.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - The use of coronary calcium scoring (CaScCT) for attenuation correction (AC) of 13N-ammonia PET/CT studies (NH3) is still being debated. We compare standard ACCT to CaScCT using various respiratory phases and coregistration methods for AC. Forty-one patients underwent a stress/restNH3. StandardACCT scans and CaScCT acquired during inspiration (CaScCTinsp, 26 patients) or expiration (CaScCTexp, 15 patients) were used to correct PET data for photon attenuation. Resulting images were compared using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman (BA) limits of agreement (LA) on segmental relative and absolute coronary blood flow (CBF) using both manual and automatic co-registration methods (rigid-body and deformable). For relative perfusion, CaScCTexp correlates better than CaScCTinsp with ACCT when using manual co-registration (r = 0.870; P<0.001 and r = 0.732; P<0.001, respectively). Automatic co-registration provides the best correlation between CaScCTexp and ACCT for relative perfusion (r = 0.956; P<0.001). Both CaScCTinsp and CaScCTexp yielded excellent correlations with ACCT for CBF when using manual co-registration (r = 0.918; P<0.001; BA mean bias 0.05 ml/min/g; LA: -0.42 to +0.3 ml/min/g and r = 0.97; P<0.001; BA mean bias 0.1 ml/min/g; LA: -0.65 to +0.5 ml/min/g, respectively). The use of CaScCTexp and deformable co-registration is best suited for AC to quantify relative perfusion and CBF enabling substantial radiation dose reduction.
AB - The use of coronary calcium scoring (CaScCT) for attenuation correction (AC) of 13N-ammonia PET/CT studies (NH3) is still being debated. We compare standard ACCT to CaScCT using various respiratory phases and coregistration methods for AC. Forty-one patients underwent a stress/restNH3. StandardACCT scans and CaScCT acquired during inspiration (CaScCTinsp, 26 patients) or expiration (CaScCTexp, 15 patients) were used to correct PET data for photon attenuation. Resulting images were compared using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman (BA) limits of agreement (LA) on segmental relative and absolute coronary blood flow (CBF) using both manual and automatic co-registration methods (rigid-body and deformable). For relative perfusion, CaScCTexp correlates better than CaScCTinsp with ACCT when using manual co-registration (r = 0.870; P<0.001 and r = 0.732; P<0.001, respectively). Automatic co-registration provides the best correlation between CaScCTexp and ACCT for relative perfusion (r = 0.956; P<0.001). Both CaScCTinsp and CaScCTexp yielded excellent correlations with ACCT for CBF when using manual co-registration (r = 0.918; P<0.001; BA mean bias 0.05 ml/min/g; LA: -0.42 to +0.3 ml/min/g and r = 0.97; P<0.001; BA mean bias 0.1 ml/min/g; LA: -0.65 to +0.5 ml/min/g, respectively). The use of CaScCTexp and deformable co-registration is best suited for AC to quantify relative perfusion and CBF enabling substantial radiation dose reduction.
KW - Attenuation correction
KW - Calcium scoring
KW - Cardiac imaging
KW - PET/CT
KW - Quantification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893697267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10554-013-0207-9
DO - 10.1007/s10554-013-0207-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 23504215
AN - SCOPUS:84893697267
SN - 1569-5794
VL - 29
SP - 1351
EP - 1360
JO - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 6
ER -