TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive genomic studies
T2 - Emerging regulatory, strategic, and quality assurance challenges for biorepositories
AU - McDonald, Sandra A.
AU - Mardis, Elaine R.
AU - Ota, David
AU - Watson, Mark A.
AU - Pfeifer, John D.
AU - Green, Jonathan M.
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - As part of the molecular revolution sweeping medicine, comprehensive genomic studies are adding powerful dimensions to medical research. However, their power exposes new regulatory, strategic, and quality assurance challenges for biorepositories. A key issue is that unlike other research techniques commonly applied to banked specimens, nucleic acid sequencing, if sufficiently extensive, yields data that could identify a patient. This evolving paradigm renders the concepts of anonymized and anonymous specimens increasingly outdated. The challenges for biorepositories in this new era include refined consent processes and wording, selection and use of legacy specimens, quality assurance procedures, institutional documentation, data sharing, and interaction with institutional review boards. Given current trends, biorepositories should consider these issues now, even if they are not currently experiencing sample requests for genomic analysis. We summarize our current experiences and best practices at Washington University Medical School, St Louis, MO, our perceptions of emerging trends, and recommendations.
AB - As part of the molecular revolution sweeping medicine, comprehensive genomic studies are adding powerful dimensions to medical research. However, their power exposes new regulatory, strategic, and quality assurance challenges for biorepositories. A key issue is that unlike other research techniques commonly applied to banked specimens, nucleic acid sequencing, if sufficiently extensive, yields data that could identify a patient. This evolving paradigm renders the concepts of anonymized and anonymous specimens increasingly outdated. The challenges for biorepositories in this new era include refined consent processes and wording, selection and use of legacy specimens, quality assurance procedures, institutional documentation, data sharing, and interaction with institutional review boards. Given current trends, biorepositories should consider these issues now, even if they are not currently experiencing sample requests for genomic analysis. We summarize our current experiences and best practices at Washington University Medical School, St Louis, MO, our perceptions of emerging trends, and recommendations.
KW - Biobanks
KW - Biorepositories
KW - Genomic studies
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Regulatory standards
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864239558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1309/AJCPXBA69LNSCVMH
DO - 10.1309/AJCPXBA69LNSCVMH
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22706855
AN - SCOPUS:84864239558
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 138
SP - 31
EP - 41
JO - American journal of clinical pathology
JF - American journal of clinical pathology
IS - 1
ER -