TY - JOUR
T1 - Complicating “the good result”
T2 - narratives of colorectal cancer screening when cancer is not found
AU - Hunleth, Jean M.
AU - Gallo, Robert
AU - Steinmetz, Emily K.
AU - James, Aimee S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/7/4
Y1 - 2019/7/4
N2 - Objectives: In this paper, we analyze narratives from a Photovoice project on colorectal cancer screening that was carried out with people who had undergone screening and were found to not have cancer. Methods: Three groups, totaling eighteen participants, took part in the project, meeting multiple times over the course of approximately 10 weeks, and discussing photos they took about colorectal cancer screening. Results: A common way in which the participants conveyed their screening experiences was through reflection on their own or other people's illnesses. Our findings highlight the multiple meanings of receiving a “good” or noncancerous screening result after undergoing cancer screening. Conclusion: Such findings suggest that framing noncancerous results only in terms of relief or other positive emotions may ignore the realities people and their families face and their remaining concerns. This paper has broader implications for policies to reduce cancer disparities as well as public health and patient-provider communication about screening.
AB - Objectives: In this paper, we analyze narratives from a Photovoice project on colorectal cancer screening that was carried out with people who had undergone screening and were found to not have cancer. Methods: Three groups, totaling eighteen participants, took part in the project, meeting multiple times over the course of approximately 10 weeks, and discussing photos they took about colorectal cancer screening. Results: A common way in which the participants conveyed their screening experiences was through reflection on their own or other people's illnesses. Our findings highlight the multiple meanings of receiving a “good” or noncancerous screening result after undergoing cancer screening. Conclusion: Such findings suggest that framing noncancerous results only in terms of relief or other positive emotions may ignore the realities people and their families face and their remaining concerns. This paper has broader implications for policies to reduce cancer disparities as well as public health and patient-provider communication about screening.
KW - colorectal < cancer type
KW - health care disparities
KW - narrative research
KW - photovoice
KW - qualitative < research methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061183412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07347332.2018.1563581
DO - 10.1080/07347332.2018.1563581
M3 - Article
C2 - 30714858
AN - SCOPUS:85061183412
SN - 0734-7332
VL - 37
SP - 509
EP - 525
JO - Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
JF - Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
IS - 4
ER -