Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Research Profiles at Washington University School of Medicine Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Departments, Divisions and Centers
Research output
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases-how do they fare compared to virgin cases?
H. Henry Lai
, Timothy B. Boone
Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS)
Division of Urologic Surgery
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
77
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases-how do they fare compared to virgin cases?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Reimplantation
100%
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
100%
Complication Rate
37%
Continence
37%
Reimplant
37%
Urethral Erosion
37%
Urethral Atrophy
37%
Reoperative
25%
Reoperation Rate
25%
Urethral Infection
25%
Male Patients
12%
Device Infection
12%
Single Surgeon
12%
Stress Incontinence
12%
Most Complex
12%
Post-prostatectomy
12%
Mechanical Failure
12%
Good Functional Outcome
12%
Leakage Rate
12%
Pad Use
12%
Atrophy Rate
12%
Case Revision
12%
Bulbar Urethra
12%
Erosion Rate
12%
Cuff Erosion
12%
Future Erosion
12%
AMS 800
12%
Medicine and Dentistry
Replantation
100%
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
100%
Infection
37%
Continence
37%
Reoperation
25%
Surgeon
12%
Prostatectomy
12%
Device Infection
12%
Stress Incontinence
12%