TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of tramadol and morphine via subcutaneous PCA following major orthopaedic surgery
AU - Hopkins, D.
AU - Shipton, E. A.
AU - Potgieter, D.
AU - Van Der Merwe, C. A.
AU - Boon, J.
AU - De Wet, C.
AU - Murphy, J.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Purpose: To compare subcutaneous PCA tramadol with subcutaneous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief after major orthopaedic surgery and for the incidence of side-effects. Methods: In a double-blind randomised controlled study 40 patients (20 in each group) self-administered either tramadol or morphine for 72 hr after surgery via sc PCA. The following variables were recorded at various time intervals: (i) pain score by means of a visual analogue scale, (ii) drug consumption and total PCA demands, (iii) vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), (iv) oxygen saturation and respiratory rate, and (v) side-effects (sedation, nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and constipation). Results: Both drugs provided effective analgesia. The mean consumption in the first 24 hr was 792 ± 90 mg tramadol and 42 ± 4 mg morphine. Thereafter, consumption of both drugs declined markedly. Moderate haemodynamic changes were observed in both the tramadol and morphine groups (with a maximum 20% decrease in mean blood pressure and a maximum 17% increase in heart rate) during the 72 hr period. Both tramadol and morphine were associated with a clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in oxygen saturation, but without changes in respiratory rates. Desaturation was less marked with tramadol. Tramadol appeared to cause more nausea and vomiting than morphine. Sedation was mild and only seen during the first few hours after surgery in both groups. Conclusion: Tramadol is an effective analgesic agent for the relief of acute postoperative pain when administered by PCA via the subcutaneous route. Under these conditions tramadol behaves much like morphine with a similar side-effect profile.
AB - Purpose: To compare subcutaneous PCA tramadol with subcutaneous PCA morphine for postoperative pain relief after major orthopaedic surgery and for the incidence of side-effects. Methods: In a double-blind randomised controlled study 40 patients (20 in each group) self-administered either tramadol or morphine for 72 hr after surgery via sc PCA. The following variables were recorded at various time intervals: (i) pain score by means of a visual analogue scale, (ii) drug consumption and total PCA demands, (iii) vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), (iv) oxygen saturation and respiratory rate, and (v) side-effects (sedation, nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and constipation). Results: Both drugs provided effective analgesia. The mean consumption in the first 24 hr was 792 ± 90 mg tramadol and 42 ± 4 mg morphine. Thereafter, consumption of both drugs declined markedly. Moderate haemodynamic changes were observed in both the tramadol and morphine groups (with a maximum 20% decrease in mean blood pressure and a maximum 17% increase in heart rate) during the 72 hr period. Both tramadol and morphine were associated with a clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in oxygen saturation, but without changes in respiratory rates. Desaturation was less marked with tramadol. Tramadol appeared to cause more nausea and vomiting than morphine. Sedation was mild and only seen during the first few hours after surgery in both groups. Conclusion: Tramadol is an effective analgesic agent for the relief of acute postoperative pain when administered by PCA via the subcutaneous route. Under these conditions tramadol behaves much like morphine with a similar side-effect profile.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031928466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF03012579
DO - 10.1007/BF03012579
M3 - Article
C2 - 9598258
AN - SCOPUS:0031928466
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 45
SP - 435
EP - 442
JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -