In order to test the ability of freeze substitution to accurately preserve the ultrastructure of the actin component of the cytoskeleton, the structure of rotary shadowed actin filaments was compared following preparation by glutaraldehyde fixation and freeze etch or freeze substitution. Freeze substituted actin filaments were further processed by either etching away frozen organic solvent or criticalpointdrying before rotary shadowing. Comparison of filament diameters showed no significant difference between actin filaments that were directly etched and those that were freeze substituted and then etched. However, freeze substituted and then criticalpointdried filaments were significantly larger in diameter than filaments that were directly etched in water. The long pitch (righthanded) two start helix was not affected by the different methods of preparation. However, the lefthandedgenetichelical repeat that was prominent in actin filaments prepared by freeze etch was more difficult to detect in freeze substituted specimen, especially following criticalpointdrying. Although the organization and distribution of actin filaments in extracted cells was similar in both freeze substituted and freeze etched specimens, there were some detectable differences. In cells that were freeze substituted and then criticalpointdried, filaments appeared to intersect at greater angles and seemed moretaut.These results suggest that freeze substitution can preserve the overall morphology of actin filaments, but some chemical or physical modification of macromolecular surface structure may occur during the substitution process and these changes may be further exaggerated by subsequent processing steps.1993 WileyLiss, Inc. Copyright1993 WileyLiss, Inc.
- Freeze etch
- Freeze substitution