Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes: A randomised trial

The SYMPHONY Investigators, R. Diaz, E. Paolasso, W. Klein, L. Piegas, M. Halinen, A. P. Dimas, I. Preda, D. Ardissino, S. Madsen, D. Sugrue, W. B. Gibler, C. B. Granger, R. A. Harrington, D. R. Holmes, E. M. Ohman, R. Califf, L. Zillman, K. Lee, P. LemonsB. McCourt, C. Campbell, B. Tardiff, J. Snapp, K. Bassett, P. Hodgson, K. Hannan, L. Kandzari, S. Hawkins, E. Hinman-Smith, M. McDougal, K. Raffetto, D. Thompson, T. Wehrle, C. Ange, R. Brown, G. Grissom, M. Heuckel, J. McCall, W. Pennachi, M. Spychala, S. Veasey, M. Pullium, T. Journey, K. Quintero, D. Mark, L. Davidson-Ray, L. Diner, C. Nelson, C. Sowers, G. Webb, M. Young, M. Bhapkar, C. Pacchiana, R. Sparapani, R. Tuttle, D. Weaver, S. Borzak, L. Douthat, E. Topol, D. Moliterno, L. Konczos, R. Baishnab, A. Bakos, L. Blashford, J. Bratsch, K. Brown, E. Cadorini, J. Carlson, P. Clemmons, M. DelValle, M. Drabik, G. Fu, K. Gates, Y. Gibson, L. Heil, N. Hill, R. Klancar, B. McHale, E. Montague, N. Pasca, L. Pergi, R. Randall, R. Rosso, K. Sankovich, D. Smith, L. Wisniewski, M. Witkowski, V. Zovkic, K. Alexander, D. Bhatt, S. Brener, L. Campbell, L. Cho, C. Cole, M. Deedy, J. Foody, J. Gassler, S. Ghaffari, G. Haas, S. Kapadia, M. S. Lauer, M. Lincoff, S. Lutton, S. Marso, D. Mukherjee, V. Patel, M. Penn, M. Robbins, M. Roe, C. Sila, M. Thamilarasan, G. Wagner, P. Armstrong, S. Bestilny, F. Van de Werf, W. Budts, S. Graux, A. Luyten, J. Simes, A. Keech, M. Kava, T. Bower, S. Chan, L. Crampton, C. Monro, M. Nayak, G. Parente, V. Riley, D. Wilton, P. Aylward, S. Dolan, C. Thomas, H. White, M. Scott, R. Frye, J. Alpert, M. Bertrand, T. Ryan, L. Fisher, L. Asarch, M. Smith, L. Lim, M. Bokslag, P. Chiu, J. Chung, S. Collins, C. Dougherty, D. Guimaraes, Z. Hakim, J. Mathieson, L. Montgomery, B. Novotny, B. Steiner, B. Wittke, R. Ahuad, R. Bastianelli, J. Bergallo, R. Castellanos, G. Covelli, R. Duran, A. Fernandez, A. Gambarte, L. Guzman, S. Macin, F. Martinez, R. Nordaby, A. Orlandini, O. Perrino, A. Piombo, D. Piskorz, E. Queirel, R. Quijano, S. Salzberg, S. Soifer, F. Soken, H. Torre, G. Aroney, J. Counsell, S. Coverdale, D. Cross, M. Davis, J. Federman, D. Fitzpatrick, B. Freedman, P. Garrahy, P. Harris, R. Hendriks, J. Horowitz, M. Horrigan, I. Jeffery, J. Lefkovits, J. Leitch, C. Lim, R. Newman, D. Owensby, W. Quinn, M. Rowe, A. Russell, B. Singh, R. Bach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

277 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Aspirin lowers risks of death and myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists further reduce the rates of ischaemic events in these patients, but the efficacy of long-term oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade has not been established. We tested whether the oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist sibrafiban would prevent more cardiovascular events than aspirin, when given within 7 days of, and sustained for 90 days after, an acute coronary syndrome event. Methods: 9233 patients who had stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome event were randomly assigned aspirin (80 mg orally twice daily) or low-dose or high-dose sibrafiban. Sibrafiban doses (3.0 mg, 4.5 mg, or 6.0 mg) were based on a model accounting for weight and serum creatinine and designed to achieve at least 25% steady-state inhibition of platelet aggregation (low dose) or at least 50% inhibition (high dose). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, non-fatal infarction or reinfarction, or severe recurrent ischaemia at 90 days. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings: The 90-day rate of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the groups assigned aspirin (302 [9.8%]), low-dose sibrafiban (310 [10.1%]; odds ratio 1.03 [95% Cl 0.87-1.21]), and high-dose sibrafiban (303 [10.1%]; 1.03 [0.87-1.21]). The groups did not differ significantly in the rates of the component events or secondary efficacy endpoints. Major bleeding was more common with high-dose sibrafiban (171 [5.7%]) than with aspirin (120 [3.9%]) or low-dose sibrafiban (159 [5.2%]). Interpretation: Sibrafiban showed no additional benefit over aspirin for secondary prevention of major ischaemic events after an acute coronary syndrome, and was associated with more dose-related bleeding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalLancet
Volume355
Issue number9201
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 29 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes: A randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this