Comparison of pyloric intervention strategies at the time of esophagectomy: Is more better?

Mara B. Antonoff, Varun Puri, Bryan F. Meyers, Kevin Baumgartner, Jennifer M. Bell, Stephen Broderick, A. Sasha Krupnick, Daniel Kreisel, G. Alexander Patterson, Traves D. Crabtree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


Background Controversy remains regarding the role of pyloric drainage procedures after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. We aimed to compare the effect of pyloric drainage strategies upon subsequent risk of complications suggestive of conduit distention, including aspiration and anastomotic leak. Methods A retrospective study was conducted reviewing patients undergoing esophagectomy between January 2007 and April 2012. Prospectively collected data included baseline comorbidities, operative details, hospital course, and complications. Statistical comparisons were performed using analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ2 testing for categorical variables. Results There were 361 esophagectomies performed during the study period; 68 were excluded from analysis (for prior esophagogastric surgery or benign disease or both). Among 293 esophagectomies included, emptying procedures were performed as follows: 44 (15%), no drainage procedure; 197 (67%), pyloromyotomy/pyloroplasty; 8 (3%), dilation alone; 44 (15%), dilation plus onabotulinumtoxinA. Aspiration occurred more frequently when no pyloric intervention was performed (5 of 44 [11.4%] versus 6 of 249 [2.4%], p = 0.030). The incidences of anastomotic leak (18 [6.1%]) and gastric outlet obstruction (5 [1.7%]) were statistically similar among groups. Subgroup analysis demonstrated persistence of these findings when limiting the comparison to transthoracic esophagectomies. Major complications directly related to pyloroplasty/ pyloromyotomy occurred in 2 patients (0.6%), including 1 death (0.3%). Conclusions These data suggest that omission of pyloric intervention at the index operation results in more frequent aspiration events. The combination of dilation plus onabotulinumtoxinA provided for a similar complication profile compared with surgical drainage. Future prospective comparisons are needed to evaluate these short-term effects of pyloric intervention as well as long-term sequelae such as dumping syndrome and bile reflux.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1950-1958
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of pyloric intervention strategies at the time of esophagectomy: Is more better?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this