TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of lithium ion Batteries, hydrogen fueled combustion Engines, and a hydrogen fuel cell in powering a small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
AU - Depcik, Christopher
AU - Cassady, Truman
AU - Collicott, Bradley
AU - Burugupally, Sindhu Preetham
AU - Li, Xianglin
AU - Alam, Shah Saud
AU - Arandia, Jose Rocha
AU - Hobeck, Jared
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - The relatively low energy density of lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries that power small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) limits their operating range. The use of hydrogen can provide a significant range improvement given its magnitude increase in mass and volume specific energy over Li-ion batteries. As a result, this effort investigates the potential of hydrogen-fueled power plants for small UAVs. Here, five powertrain options are simulated, namely Li-ion battery (LiNiCoAlO2 and Li-air), internal combustion engine (ICE) with integrated generator, parallel hybrid ICE, free piston engine (FPE) with integrated linear generator, and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The three major outcomes of this study include: (1) Though the performance characteristics of an ICE are superior to a FPE, the ICE has a relatively high manufacturing cost due to a more complex architecture, whereas a FPE can directly convert thermal energy to electricity; (2) PEMFCs can be readily integrated into an UAV since they provide electric power directly without a convoluted energy conversion system, reducing the overall weight of an UAV; and (3) Theoretically, the use of a Li-air battery pack would result in a longest flight time and simplest configuration; however, the necessary chemistry is still years away from practical implementation.
AB - The relatively low energy density of lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries that power small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) limits their operating range. The use of hydrogen can provide a significant range improvement given its magnitude increase in mass and volume specific energy over Li-ion batteries. As a result, this effort investigates the potential of hydrogen-fueled power plants for small UAVs. Here, five powertrain options are simulated, namely Li-ion battery (LiNiCoAlO2 and Li-air), internal combustion engine (ICE) with integrated generator, parallel hybrid ICE, free piston engine (FPE) with integrated linear generator, and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The three major outcomes of this study include: (1) Though the performance characteristics of an ICE are superior to a FPE, the ICE has a relatively high manufacturing cost due to a more complex architecture, whereas a FPE can directly convert thermal energy to electricity; (2) PEMFCs can be readily integrated into an UAV since they provide electric power directly without a convoluted energy conversion system, reducing the overall weight of an UAV; and (3) Theoretically, the use of a Li-air battery pack would result in a longest flight time and simplest configuration; however, the necessary chemistry is still years away from practical implementation.
KW - Free piston engine
KW - Fuel cell
KW - Hydrogen
KW - Internal combustion engine
KW - Lithium-ion battery
KW - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078546527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112514
DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112514
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078546527
SN - 0196-8904
VL - 207
JO - Energy Conversion and Management
JF - Energy Conversion and Management
M1 - 112514
ER -