Comparison of effects of U18666A and enantiomeric U18666A on sterol synthesis and induction of apoptosis

Richard J. Cenedella, Patricia S. Sexton, Kathiresan Krishnan, Douglas F. Covey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Treatment of animals or cells with the amphipathic tertiary amine U18666A {3β-[2-(diethylamino) ethoxy]androst-5-en-17-one} provides models for several human diseases (e.g., cataracts, Niemann-Pick disease, and epilepsy). Although U18666A can inhibit several enzymes in the cholesterol synthesis pathway, we hypothesized that induction of these varied conditions was due to physical effects of the amine rather than to inhibition of specific proteins. To test this possibility we compared the capacity of U18666A and its enantiomer, ent-U18666A, to inhibit net sterol synthesis and induce apoptosis in cultured bovine lens epithelial cells. Nonenantiospecific actions dependent on the physical properties of these mirror image molecules would be identical, but effects dependent upon enantiospecific interactions would be different for the enantiomers. At the same concentrations, both forms of the compound equally inhibited sterol synthesis and induced apoptosis. These observations supported a generalized mechanism of enzyme inhibition such as perturbation of the microenvironment of endoplasmic enzymes and alteration of membrane order, perhaps of the mitochondrial membrane, to explain induction of apoptosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)635-640
Number of pages6
JournalLipids
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of effects of U18666A and enantiomeric U18666A on sterol synthesis and induction of apoptosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this