TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of 3 Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests and a Rapid Antigen Test with Culture for the Detection of Group A Streptococci from Throat Swabs
AU - Parker, Kyle G.
AU - Gandra, Sumanth
AU - Matushek, Scott
AU - Beavis, Kathleen G.
AU - Tesic, Vera
AU - Charnot-Katsikas, Angella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration cleared 3 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) assays for detection of Streptococcus pyogenes [group A Streptococcus (GAS)] in pharyngeal specimens. However, there are limited studies evaluating the performance of these NAAT assays. METHODS: We compared the results of 3 NAATs (cobas Liat, Luminex Aries, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress) and a rapid antigen assay (Quidel QuickVue in-line strep A) with the accepted gold standard method, bacterial culture. RESULTS: Sixty-eight throat swab specimens collected between August and October 2017 were tested. Compared to bacterial culture, the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting GAS were as follows: cobas Liat: 100%, 97.4%, 96.7%, and 100%; Cepheid Xpert: 100%, 97.4%, 96.7%, and 100%; Luminex Aries: 95.2%, 100%, 100%, and 95.5%. The Quidel QuickVue in-line strep A assay showed poor sensitivity, detecting only 5.2% of culture-positive specimens. CONCLUSION: The 3 NAATs have high sensitivity when compared with bacterial culture for detection of GAS. With rapid turnaround time and ease of use, these tests can be considered as reliable point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of GAS, replacing the need for back-up culture.
AB - BACKGROUND: Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration cleared 3 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) assays for detection of Streptococcus pyogenes [group A Streptococcus (GAS)] in pharyngeal specimens. However, there are limited studies evaluating the performance of these NAAT assays. METHODS: We compared the results of 3 NAATs (cobas Liat, Luminex Aries, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress) and a rapid antigen assay (Quidel QuickVue in-line strep A) with the accepted gold standard method, bacterial culture. RESULTS: Sixty-eight throat swab specimens collected between August and October 2017 were tested. Compared to bacterial culture, the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting GAS were as follows: cobas Liat: 100%, 97.4%, 96.7%, and 100%; Cepheid Xpert: 100%, 97.4%, 96.7%, and 100%; Luminex Aries: 95.2%, 100%, 100%, and 95.5%. The Quidel QuickVue in-line strep A assay showed poor sensitivity, detecting only 5.2% of culture-positive specimens. CONCLUSION: The 3 NAATs have high sensitivity when compared with bacterial culture for detection of GAS. With rapid turnaround time and ease of use, these tests can be considered as reliable point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of GAS, replacing the need for back-up culture.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086603622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1373/jalm.2018.028696
DO - 10.1373/jalm.2018.028696
M3 - Article
C2 - 31639661
AN - SCOPUS:85086603622
SN - 2576-9456
VL - 4
SP - 164
EP - 169
JO - The journal of applied laboratory medicine
JF - The journal of applied laboratory medicine
IS - 2
ER -