Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment: a case study

Chunhua Weng; J. Thomas Bigger; Linda Busacca; Adam Wilcox; Asqual Getaneh

Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment: a case study

Chunhua Weng, J. Thomas Bigger, Linda Busacca, Adam Wilcox, Asqual Getaneh

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper reports a case study comparing the relative efficiency of using a Diabetes Registry or a Clinical Data Warehouse to recruit participants for a diabetes clinical trial, TECOS. The Clinical Data Warehouse generated higher positive predictive accuracy (31% vs. 6.6%) and higher participant recruitment than the Registry (30 vs. 14 participants) in a shorter time period (59 vs. 74 working days). We identify important factors that increase clinical trial recruitment efficiency and lower cost.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	867-871
Number of pages	5
Journal	AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Volume	2010
State	Published - 2010

Cite this

@article{59376f2ff91b495280a9c55b81a6ac51,

title = "Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment: a case study",

abstract = "This paper reports a case study comparing the relative efficiency of using a Diabetes Registry or a Clinical Data Warehouse to recruit participants for a diabetes clinical trial, TECOS. The Clinical Data Warehouse generated higher positive predictive accuracy (31% vs. 6.6%) and higher participant recruitment than the Registry (30 vs. 14 participants) in a shorter time period (59 vs. 74 working days). We identify important factors that increase clinical trial recruitment efficiency and lower cost.",

author = "Chunhua Weng and Bigger, {J. Thomas} and Linda Busacca and Adam Wilcox and Asqual Getaneh",

year = "2010",

language = "English",

volume = "2010",

pages = "867--871",

journal = "AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium",

issn = "1559-4076",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment

T2 - a case study

AU - Weng, Chunhua

AU - Bigger, J. Thomas

AU - Busacca, Linda

AU - Wilcox, Adam

AU - Getaneh, Asqual

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper reports a case study comparing the relative efficiency of using a Diabetes Registry or a Clinical Data Warehouse to recruit participants for a diabetes clinical trial, TECOS. The Clinical Data Warehouse generated higher positive predictive accuracy (31% vs. 6.6%) and higher participant recruitment than the Registry (30 vs. 14 participants) in a shorter time period (59 vs. 74 working days). We identify important factors that increase clinical trial recruitment efficiency and lower cost.

AB - This paper reports a case study comparing the relative efficiency of using a Diabetes Registry or a Clinical Data Warehouse to recruit participants for a diabetes clinical trial, TECOS. The Clinical Data Warehouse generated higher positive predictive accuracy (31% vs. 6.6%) and higher participant recruitment than the Registry (30 vs. 14 participants) in a shorter time period (59 vs. 74 working days). We identify important factors that increase clinical trial recruitment efficiency and lower cost.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983070537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21347102

AN - SCOPUS:84983070537

SN - 1559-4076

VL - 2010

SP - 867

EP - 871

JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium

ER -

Comparing the effectiveness of a clinical registry and a clinical data warehouse for supporting clinical trial recruitment: a case study

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this