Comparing strategies to assess multiple behavior change in behavioral intervention studies

Bettina F. Drake, Lisa M. Quintiliani, Amy L. Sapp, Yi Li, Amy E. Harley, Karen M. Emmons, Glorian Sorensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Alternatives to individual behavior change methods have been proposed; however, little has been done to investigate how these methods compare. To explore the four methods that quantify change in multiple risk behaviors targeting four common behaviors, we utilized data from two cluster-randomized, multiple behavior change trials conducted in two settings: small businesses and health centers. Methods used were (1) summative, (2) z-score, (3) optimal linear combination, and (4) impact score. In the small business study, methods 2 and 3 revealed similar outcomes. However, physical activity did not contribute to method 3. In the health centers study, similar results were found with each of the methods. Multivitamin intake contributed significantly more to each of the summary measures than other behaviors. Selection of methods to assess multiple behavior change in intervention trials must consider study design and the targeted population when determining the appropriate method/s to use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-121
Number of pages8
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Keywords

  • Intervention
  • Methods
  • Multiple behavior change
  • Multiple risk factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing strategies to assess multiple behavior change in behavioral intervention studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this