Common genetic vulnerability for pathological gambling and alcohol dependence in men

Wendy S. Slutske, Seth Eisen, William R. True, Michael J. Lyons, Jack Goldberg, Ming Tsuang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

279 Scopus citations


Background: In comparison with alcohol dependence (AD), relatively little is known about the causes of pathological gambling (PG). Given the high rate of comorbidity between PG and AD, knowledge about the causes of AD may be applied to understanding those of PG. Methods: Subjects were adult male twin pairs from the Vietnam Era Twin Registry. Lifetime histories of PG and AD were assessed by structured psychiatric telephone interview. The validity of a continuum of PG liability was tested to determine whether the causes of subclinical PG, or problem gambling, are quantitatively or qualitatively distinct from those of DSM-III-R PG disorder. Genetic model- fitting methods were used to quantify the extent to which the genetic and environmental risk for PG could be explained by the risk for AD. Results: Tests of the continuity model of PG were all consistent with the hypothesis that subclinical PG and DSM-III-R PG disorder have many, perhaps all, of the same risk factors and thus differ quantitatively rather than qualitatively. Depending on the PG definition, between 12% and 20% of the genetic variation and between 3% and 8% of the nonshared environmental variation in the risk for PG were accounted for by the risk for AD. Conclusions: Subclinical PG, or problem gambling, may be a milder form of PG, rather than an etiologically distinct syndrome. Risk for AD accounts for a significant but modest proportion of the genetic and environmental risk for subclinical PG and DSM- III-R PG disorder.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)666-673
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2000


Dive into the research topics of 'Common genetic vulnerability for pathological gambling and alcohol dependence in men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this