TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination of Multiple Molecular Markers Can Improve Prognostication in Patients With Locally Advanced and Lymph Node Positive Bladder Cancer
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Chade, Daher C.
AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
AU - Ashfaq, Raheela
AU - Isbarn, Hendrik
AU - Fradet, Yves
AU - Bastian, Patrick J.
AU - Nielsen, Matthew E.
AU - Capitanio, Umberto
AU - Jeldres, Claudio
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Lerner, Seth P.
AU - Sagalowsky, Arthur I.
AU - Cote, Richard J.
AU - Lotan, Yair
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - Purpose: We tested whether the combination of 4 established cell cycle regulators (p53, pRB, p21 and p27) could improve the ability to predict clinical outcomes in a large multi-institutional collaboration of patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. We also assessed whether the combination of molecular markers is superior to any individual biomarker. Materials and Methods: The study comprised 692 patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy (median followup 5.3 years). Scoring was performed using advanced cell imaging and color detection software. The base model incorporated patient age, gender, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, concomitant carcinoma in situ and adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Individual molecular markers did not improve the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence and cancer specific mortality. Combination of all 4 molecular markers into number of altered molecular markers resulted in significantly higher predictive accuracy than any single biomarker (p <0.001). Moreover addition of number of altered molecular markers to the base model significantly improved the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence (3.9%, p <0.001) and cancer specific mortality (4.3%, p <0.001). Addition of number of altered molecular markers retained statistical significance for improving the prediction of clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients with pT3N0 (280), pT4N0 (83) and pTany Npositive (329) disease (p <0.001). Conclusions: While the status of individual molecular markers does not add sufficient value to outcome prediction in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, combinations of molecular markers may improve molecular staging, prognostication and possibly prediction of response to therapy.
AB - Purpose: We tested whether the combination of 4 established cell cycle regulators (p53, pRB, p21 and p27) could improve the ability to predict clinical outcomes in a large multi-institutional collaboration of patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. We also assessed whether the combination of molecular markers is superior to any individual biomarker. Materials and Methods: The study comprised 692 patients with pT3-4N0 or pTany Npositive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy (median followup 5.3 years). Scoring was performed using advanced cell imaging and color detection software. The base model incorporated patient age, gender, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, concomitant carcinoma in situ and adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Individual molecular markers did not improve the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence and cancer specific mortality. Combination of all 4 molecular markers into number of altered molecular markers resulted in significantly higher predictive accuracy than any single biomarker (p <0.001). Moreover addition of number of altered molecular markers to the base model significantly improved the predictive accuracy for disease recurrence (3.9%, p <0.001) and cancer specific mortality (4.3%, p <0.001). Addition of number of altered molecular markers retained statistical significance for improving the prediction of clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients with pT3N0 (280), pT4N0 (83) and pTany Npositive (329) disease (p <0.001). Conclusions: While the status of individual molecular markers does not add sufficient value to outcome prediction in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, combinations of molecular markers may improve molecular staging, prognostication and possibly prediction of response to therapy.
KW - biological markers
KW - immunohistochemistry
KW - recurrence
KW - survival
KW - urinary bladder neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71249096845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.115
DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.115
M3 - Article
C2 - 19913255
AN - SCOPUS:71249096845
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 183
SP - 68
EP - 75
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 1
ER -