Clinically meaningful improvement in disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) following cervical spine surgery

Saad Javeed, Jacob K. Greenberg, Benjamin Plog, Justin K. Zhang, Alexander T. Yahanda, Christopher F. Dibble, Jawad M. Khalifeh, Miguel Ruiz-Cardozo, Raj S. Lavadi, Camilo A. Molina, Paul Santiago, Nitin Agarwal, Brenton H. Pennicooke, Wilson Z. Ray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with cervical spine disease suffer from upper limb disability. At present, no clinical benchmarks exist for clinically meaningful change in the upper limb function following cervical spine surgery. PURPOSE: Primary: to establish clinically meaningful metrics; the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper limb functional improvement in patients following cervical spine surgery. Secondary: to identify the prognostic factors of MCID and SCB of upper limb function following cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent cervical spine surgery from 2012 to 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). METHODS: MCID was defined as minimal improvement and SCB as substantial improvement in the DASH score at last follow-up. The anchor-based methods (ROC analyses) defined optimal MCID and SCB thresholds with area under curve (AUC) in discriminating improved vs. non-improved patients. The MCID was also calculated by distribution-based methods: half standard-deviation (0.5-SD) and standard error of the mean (SEM) method. A multivariable logistic regression evaluated the impact of baseline factors in achieving the MCID and SCB in DASH following cervical spine surgery. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 1,046 patients with average age of 57±11.3 years, 53% males, underwent cervical spine surgery. Using the ROC analysis, the threshold for MCID was –8 points with AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67–0.79) and the SCB was –18 points with AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85–0.91). The MCID was –11 points by 0.5–SD and –12 points by SEM-method. On multivariable analysis, patients with myelopathy had lower odds of achieving MCID and SCB, whereas older patients and those with ≥6 months duration of symptoms had lower odds of achieving DASH MCID and SCB respectively. CONCLUSIONs: In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, MCID of –8 points and SCB of –18 points in DASH improvement may be considered clinically significant. These metrics may enable evaluation of minimal and substantial improvement in the upper extremity function following cervical spine surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)832-840
Number of pages9
JournalSpine Journal
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Minimum clinically important difference
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Physical function
  • Substantial clinical benefit
  • Upper-extremity impairment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinically meaningful improvement in disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) following cervical spine surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this