TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical studies in COVID-related olfactory disorders
T2 - Review of an institutional experience
AU - Tharakan, Theresa
AU - Kallogjeri, Dorina
AU - Piccirillo, Jay F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Objective: To share a single institutional experience with clinical research on COVID-related olfactory dysfunction (OD). Data Source/Method: Narrative review of published original data and ongoing clinical trials on COVID-related OD at Washington University from 2020 to 2023. Results: There were three new diagnostic-/patient-reported outcome measures developed and tested. We report five clinical trials of interventions for COVID-related olfactory disorders: combined Visual-Olfactory Training (VOLT) with patient-preferred scents versus standard olfactory training (VOLT trial), oral gabapentin versus placebo (Gabapentin for the Relief of Acquired Chemosensory Experience trial), nasal theophylline irrigations versus placebo (Smell Changes and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline trial), stellate ganglion block (single-arm), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus lifestyle intervention (MBSR trial). Conclusions: Initial intervention trials for COVID-related OD have shown potential for improving subjective and objective olfactory outcomes. However, there remains no gold standard treatment that definitively outperforms placebo in controlled trials. Therefore, continued investigation of novel therapeutic strategies for COVID-related OD is necessary to maximize olfactory outcomes for affected patients.
AB - Objective: To share a single institutional experience with clinical research on COVID-related olfactory dysfunction (OD). Data Source/Method: Narrative review of published original data and ongoing clinical trials on COVID-related OD at Washington University from 2020 to 2023. Results: There were three new diagnostic-/patient-reported outcome measures developed and tested. We report five clinical trials of interventions for COVID-related olfactory disorders: combined Visual-Olfactory Training (VOLT) with patient-preferred scents versus standard olfactory training (VOLT trial), oral gabapentin versus placebo (Gabapentin for the Relief of Acquired Chemosensory Experience trial), nasal theophylline irrigations versus placebo (Smell Changes and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline trial), stellate ganglion block (single-arm), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus lifestyle intervention (MBSR trial). Conclusions: Initial intervention trials for COVID-related OD have shown potential for improving subjective and objective olfactory outcomes. However, there remains no gold standard treatment that definitively outperforms placebo in controlled trials. Therefore, continued investigation of novel therapeutic strategies for COVID-related OD is necessary to maximize olfactory outcomes for affected patients.
KW - COVID
KW - chemosensory disorders
KW - olfactory dysfunction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190949925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/wjo2.176
DO - 10.1002/wjo2.176
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38855285
AN - SCOPUS:85190949925
SN - 2095-8811
VL - 10
SP - 129
EP - 136
JO - World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 2
ER -