Clinical outcomes of revision to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Keyphrases

• Clinical Outcomes 100%
• Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rTSA) 100%
• Surgeons 40%
• Revision Surgery 30%
• Visual Analog Pain Scale 20%
• Elbow 20%
• Revision Rate 20%
• Hemiarthroplasty 20%
• Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 20%
• Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty 20%
• Reverse TSA 20%
• Etiology 10%
• Young Patients 10%
• Single Institution 10%
• Patient Demographics 10%
• Anatomic 10%
• Patient Satisfaction 10%
• Rotator Cuff Tear 10%
• Appropriate Utilization 10%
• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 10%
• Successful Outcome 10%
• Clinical Follow-up 10%
• Patient-reported Outcomes 10%
• Aseptic Revision 10%
• Pain Patients 10%
• Persistent Pain 10%
• Evaluation Score 10%
• Scale Validation 10%
• Glenohumeral Arthritis 10%
• Shoulder Range of Motion 10%
• Reasons for Revision 10%
• Glenoid Loosening 10%
• Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy 10%
• Failed Hemiarthroplasty 10%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Total Shoulder Arthroplasty 100%
• Hemiarthroplasty 30%
• Surgeon 20%
• Visual Analog Scale 20%
• Patient-Reported Outcome 20%
• Shoulder Arthroplasty 20%
• American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score 20%
• Arthritis 10%
• Infection 10%
• Osteotomy 10%
• Patient Satisfaction 10%
• Patient Population 10%
• Rotator Cuff 10%
• Range of Motion 10%
• Persistent Pain 10%