Clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer who selected active surveillance using a clinical cell cycle risk score

  • Sanjeev Kaul
  • , Kirk J. Wojno
  • , Steven Stone
  • , Brent Evans
  • , Ryan Bernhisel
  • , Stephanie Meek
  • , Richard E. D'Anna
  • , Jeffrey Ferguson
  • , Jeffrey Glaser
  • , Todd M. Morgan
  • , Jeremy Lieb
  • , Robert Yan
  • , Todd Cohen
  • , Behfar Ehdaie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate active surveillance (AS) selection, safety and durability among men with low-risk prostate cancer assessed using the clinical cell cycle risk (CCR) score, a combined clinical and molecular score. Patients & methods: Initial treatment selection (AS vs treatment) and duration of AS were evaluated for men with low-risk prostate cancer according to the CCR score and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Adverse events included biochemical recurrence and metastasis. Results: 82.4% (547/664) of men initially selected AS (median follow-up: 2.2 years), 0.4% (2/547) of whom experienced an adverse event. Two-thirds of patients remained on AS for more than 3 years; patient choice was the most common reason for leaving AS. Conclusion: The CCR score may aid in the identification of men who can safely defer prostate cancer treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-499
Number of pages9
JournalPersonalized Medicine
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • active surveillance
  • molecular score
  • prostate cancer
  • risk assessment
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer who selected active surveillance using a clinical cell cycle risk score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this