Abstract
Aim: To evaluate active surveillance (AS) selection, safety and durability among men with low-risk prostate cancer assessed using the clinical cell cycle risk (CCR) score, a combined clinical and molecular score. Patients & methods: Initial treatment selection (AS vs treatment) and duration of AS were evaluated for men with low-risk prostate cancer according to the CCR score and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Adverse events included biochemical recurrence and metastasis. Results: 82.4% (547/664) of men initially selected AS (median follow-up: 2.2 years), 0.4% (2/547) of whom experienced an adverse event. Two-thirds of patients remained on AS for more than 3 years; patient choice was the most common reason for leaving AS. Conclusion: The CCR score may aid in the identification of men who can safely defer prostate cancer treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 491-499 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Personalized Medicine |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- active surveillance
- molecular score
- prostate cancer
- risk assessment
- survival
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer who selected active surveillance using a clinical cell cycle risk score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver