TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical outcome of redo operation on aortic root
AU - Fukunaga, Naoto
AU - Koyama, Tadaaki
AU - Konishi, Yasunobu
AU - Murashita, Takashi
AU - Kanemitsu, Hideo
AU - Okada, Yukikatsu
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Background: With the increasing use of biologic conduits or bioprosthetic valve, the number of patients who require redo operation on aortic root increased. Methods: In the past 22 years, 14 patients underwent redo operation on aortic root. The mean age was 61.9 ± 14.8 years. Previous operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 4), aortic root replacement with subcoronary technique (n = 3) and Bentall operation (n = 7). The operation interval was 5.4 ± 6.4 years. Indication for redo operation included structural valve deterioration (n = 6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 4), perivalvular leakage (n = 2), dilatation of sinus of Valsalva (n = 1) and dehiscence of proximal anastomosis line (n = 1). Mean follow-up period was 5.3 ± 5.2 years. Results: Present operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 5) and Bentall operation (n = 9). There was one in-hospital death (7.1 %) caused by arrhythmia. Postoperative complications included implantation of permanent pacemaker (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2) and re-intubation (n = 1). The 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9 %. Freedom from redo aortic operation at 5 years was 100 %. Conclusion: Redo operation on aortic root can be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality and good late survival.
AB - Background: With the increasing use of biologic conduits or bioprosthetic valve, the number of patients who require redo operation on aortic root increased. Methods: In the past 22 years, 14 patients underwent redo operation on aortic root. The mean age was 61.9 ± 14.8 years. Previous operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 4), aortic root replacement with subcoronary technique (n = 3) and Bentall operation (n = 7). The operation interval was 5.4 ± 6.4 years. Indication for redo operation included structural valve deterioration (n = 6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 4), perivalvular leakage (n = 2), dilatation of sinus of Valsalva (n = 1) and dehiscence of proximal anastomosis line (n = 1). Mean follow-up period was 5.3 ± 5.2 years. Results: Present operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 5) and Bentall operation (n = 9). There was one in-hospital death (7.1 %) caused by arrhythmia. Postoperative complications included implantation of permanent pacemaker (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2) and re-intubation (n = 1). The 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9 %. Freedom from redo aortic operation at 5 years was 100 %. Conclusion: Redo operation on aortic root can be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality and good late survival.
KW - Aortic root
KW - Redo operation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899021293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11748-013-0332-3
DO - 10.1007/s11748-013-0332-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 24136125
AN - SCOPUS:84899021293
SN - 1863-6705
VL - 62
SP - 215
EP - 220
JO - General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 4
ER -