Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies

DDD Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Defects in the cohesin pathway are associated with cohesinopathies, notably Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS). We aimed to delineate pathogenic variants in known and candidate cohesinopathy genes from a clinical exome perspective. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients referred for clinical exome sequencing (CES, N = 10,698). Patients with causative variants in novel or recently described cohesinopathy genes were enrolled for phenotypic characterization. Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide and insertion/deletion variants (SNVs/indels) were identified in established disease genes including NIPBL (N = 5), SMC1A (N = 14), SMC3 (N = 4), RAD21 (N = 2), and HDAC8 (N = 8). The phenotypes in this genetically defined cohort skew towards the mild end of CdLS spectrum as compared with phenotype-driven cohorts. Candidate or recently reported cohesinopathy genes were supported by de novo SNVs/indels in STAG1 (N = 3), STAG2 (N = 5), PDS5A (N = 1), and WAPL (N = 1), and one inherited SNV in PDS5A. We also identified copy-number deletions affecting STAG1 (two de novo, one of unknown inheritance) and STAG2 (one of unknown inheritance). Patients with STAG1 and STAG2 variants presented with overlapping features yet without characteristic facial features of CdLS. Conclusion: CES effectively identified disease-causing alleles at the mild end of the cohensinopathy spectrum and enabled characterization of candidate disease genes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-675
Number of pages13
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Keywords

  • Atypical cohesinopathies
  • Clinical exome sequencing (CES)
  • Cohesin pathway
  • STAG1
  • STAG2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical exome sequencing reveals locus heterogeneity and phenotypic variability of cohesinopathies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this