Clinical evaluation of soft tissue organ boundary visualization on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging

Elisabeth Weiss, Jian Wu, William Sleeman, Joshua Bryant, Priya Mitra, Michael Myers, Tatjana Ivanova, Nitai Mukhopadhyay, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan, Martin Murphy, Jeffrey Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Cone-beam computed tomographic images (CBCTs) are increasingly used for setup correction, soft tissue targeting, and image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. However, CBCT image quality is limited by low contrast and imaging artifacts. This analysis investigates the detectability of soft tissue boundaries in CBCT by performing a multiple-observer segmentation study. Methods and Materials: In four prostate cancer patients prostate, bladder and rectum were repeatedly delineated by five observers on CBCTs and fan-beam CTs (FBCTs). A volumetric analysis of contouring variations was performed by calculating coefficients of variation (COV: standard deviation/average volume). The topographical distribution of contouring variations was analyzed using an average surface mesh-based method. Results: Observer- and patient-averaged COVs for FBCT/CBCT were 0.09/0.19 for prostate, 0.05/0.08 for bladder, and 0.09/0.08 for rectum. Contouring variations on FBCT were significantly smaller than on CBCT for prostate (p < 0.03) and bladder (p < 0.04), but not for rectum (p < 0.37; intermodality differences). Intraobserver variations from repeated contouring of the same image set were not significant for either FBCT or CBCT (p < 0.05). Average standard deviations of individual observers' contour differences from average surface meshes on FBCT vs. CBCT were 1.5 vs. 2.1 mm for prostate, 0.7 vs. 1.4 mm for bladder, and 1.3 vs. 1.5 mm for rectum. The topographical distribution of contouring variations was similar for FBCT and CBCT. Conclusion: Contouring variations were larger on CBCT than FBCT, except for rectum. Given the well-documented uncertainty in soft tissue contouring in the pelvis, improvement of CBCT image quality and establishment of well-defined soft tissue identification rules are desirable for image-guided radiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)929-936
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 9 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cone-beam CT
  • Image quality
  • Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Segmentation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical evaluation of soft tissue organ boundary visualization on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Weiss, E., Wu, J., Sleeman, W., Bryant, J., Mitra, P., Myers, M., Ivanova, T., Mukhopadhyay, N., Ramakrishnan, V., Murphy, M., & Williamson, J. (2010). Clinical evaluation of soft tissue organ boundary visualization on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 78(3), 929-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.007