TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative sepsis among hospitalized patients
T2 - Shifting burden of disease?
AU - Britt, Nicholas S.
AU - Ritchie, David J.
AU - Kollef, Marin H.
AU - Burnham, Carey Ann D.
AU - Durkin, Michael J.
AU - Hampton, Nicholas B.
AU - Micek, Scott T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number KL2TR002346 (M.J.D.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: N.S.B. has served as a consultant on research grants from Merck & Co. and Gilead Sciences. D.J.R. has received speaking honoraria from Allergan, Astellas Pharma, and Theravance Biopharma. C.A.B. has received research support from bioMerieux, Cepheid, Theravance Biopharma, Accelerate Diagnostics, and Aperture Bio, and consulting fees from Thermo Fisher and Monsanto. M.J.D. has received grant funding from Merck & Co. Major Article
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli are an emerging public health threat. However, there is a paucity of data examining comparative incidence rates, risk factors, and outcomes in this population. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban tertiary-care academic medical center. We included patients admitted from 2012 to 2015 who met the following criteria: i) age ≥ 18 years; and ii) culture positive for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or carbapenem-resistant non-Enterobacteriaceae (CRNE) from any site. Exclusion criteria were: i) < 2 systemic inflammatory response criteria; ii) cystic fibrosis; and iii) no targeted treatment. We evaluated hospital survival by Cox regression and year-by-year differences in the distribution of cases by the Cochran-Armitage test. Results: 448 patients were analyzed (CRE, n = 111 [24.8%]; CRNE, n = 337 [75.2%]). CRE sepsis cases increased significantly over the study period (P <.001), driven primarily by increasing incidence of Enterobacter spp. infection (P =.004). No difference was observed in hospital survival between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.02; P =.285), even after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.62-1.87; P =.799). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis. Dramatic increases in CRE, particularly Enterobacter spp., appear to be causing a shift in the burden of clinically significant carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection.
AB - Background: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli are an emerging public health threat. However, there is a paucity of data examining comparative incidence rates, risk factors, and outcomes in this population. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban tertiary-care academic medical center. We included patients admitted from 2012 to 2015 who met the following criteria: i) age ≥ 18 years; and ii) culture positive for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or carbapenem-resistant non-Enterobacteriaceae (CRNE) from any site. Exclusion criteria were: i) < 2 systemic inflammatory response criteria; ii) cystic fibrosis; and iii) no targeted treatment. We evaluated hospital survival by Cox regression and year-by-year differences in the distribution of cases by the Cochran-Armitage test. Results: 448 patients were analyzed (CRE, n = 111 [24.8%]; CRNE, n = 337 [75.2%]). CRE sepsis cases increased significantly over the study period (P <.001), driven primarily by increasing incidence of Enterobacter spp. infection (P =.004). No difference was observed in hospital survival between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.02; P =.285), even after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.62-1.87; P =.799). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with CRE versus CRNE sepsis. Dramatic increases in CRE, particularly Enterobacter spp., appear to be causing a shift in the burden of clinically significant carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection.
KW - Carbapenem resistance
KW - Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
KW - Multidrug resistance
KW - Pseudomonas aeruginosa
KW - Sepsis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046168966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.03.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.03.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29706365
AN - SCOPUS:85046168966
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 46
SP - 1092
EP - 1096
JO - American Journal of Infection Control
JF - American Journal of Infection Control
IS - 10
ER -