TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification algorithms for the identification of structural injury in TBI using brain electrical activity
AU - Prichep, Leslie S.
AU - Ghosh Dastidar, Samanwoy
AU - Jacquin, Arnaud
AU - Koppes, William
AU - Miller, Jonathan
AU - Radman, Thomas
AU - O'Neil, Brian
AU - Naunheim, Rosanne
AU - Huff, J. Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a clinical research grant from BrainScope, Co., Inc., to the clinical sites participating in data acquisition. Three of the co-authors, Drs. Naunheim, O׳Neil and Huff, are principal investigators at their respective sites. Dr. Prichep serves as consultant to BrainScope, Inc., and holds financial interest in BrainScope, Co., Inc. through patented technology from NYU School of Medicine. Drs. Ghosh-Dastidar, Jacquin, and Radman, and Mr. Koppes and Mr. Miller are BrainScope employees and members of the BrainScope Algorithm Development team. Strict adherence to ethical concerns was followed and all subjects signed written informed consents for participation in the study.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Background: There is an urgent need for objective criteria adjunctive to standard clinical assessment of acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Details of the development of a quantitative index to identify structural brain injury based on brain electrical activity will be described. Methods: Acute closed head injured and normal patients (n=1470) were recruited from 16 US Emergency Departments and evaluated using brain electrical activity (EEG) recorded from forehead electrodes. Patients had high GCS (median=15), and most presented with low suspicion of brain injury. Patients were divided into a CT positive (CT+) group and a group with CT negative findings or where CT scans were not ordered according to standard assessment (CT-/CT_NR). Three different classifier methodologies, Ensemble Harmony, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and Genetic Algorithm (GA), were utilized. Results: Similar performance accuracy was obtained for all three methodologies with an average sensitivity/specificity of 97.5%/59.5%, area under the curves (AUC) of 0.90 and average Negative Predictive Validity (NPV)>99%. Sensitivity was highest for CT+ cases with potentially life threatening hematomas, where two of three classifiers were 100%. Conclusion: Similar performance of these classifiers suggests that the optimal separation of the populations was obtained given the overlap of the underlying distributions of features of brain activity. High sensitivity to CT+ injuries (highest in hematomas) and specificity significantly higher than that obtained using ED guidelines for imaging, supports the enhanced clinical utility of this technology and suggests the potential role in the objective, rapid and more optimal triage of TBI patients.
AB - Background: There is an urgent need for objective criteria adjunctive to standard clinical assessment of acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Details of the development of a quantitative index to identify structural brain injury based on brain electrical activity will be described. Methods: Acute closed head injured and normal patients (n=1470) were recruited from 16 US Emergency Departments and evaluated using brain electrical activity (EEG) recorded from forehead electrodes. Patients had high GCS (median=15), and most presented with low suspicion of brain injury. Patients were divided into a CT positive (CT+) group and a group with CT negative findings or where CT scans were not ordered according to standard assessment (CT-/CT_NR). Three different classifier methodologies, Ensemble Harmony, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and Genetic Algorithm (GA), were utilized. Results: Similar performance accuracy was obtained for all three methodologies with an average sensitivity/specificity of 97.5%/59.5%, area under the curves (AUC) of 0.90 and average Negative Predictive Validity (NPV)>99%. Sensitivity was highest for CT+ cases with potentially life threatening hematomas, where two of three classifiers were 100%. Conclusion: Similar performance of these classifiers suggests that the optimal separation of the populations was obtained given the overlap of the underlying distributions of features of brain activity. High sensitivity to CT+ injuries (highest in hematomas) and specificity significantly higher than that obtained using ED guidelines for imaging, supports the enhanced clinical utility of this technology and suggests the potential role in the objective, rapid and more optimal triage of TBI patients.
KW - Acute traumatic brain injury
KW - Classifier algorithms
KW - Electrophysiology of TBI
KW - Genetic algorithms
KW - Quantitative brain activity
KW - Structural brain injury
KW - TBI
KW - TBI triage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906086140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.07.011
DO - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.07.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 25137412
AN - SCOPUS:84906086140
SN - 0010-4825
VL - 53
SP - 125
EP - 133
JO - Computers in Biology and Medicine
JF - Computers in Biology and Medicine
ER -