Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis to Assess Risk of Progression after Long-term Response to PD-(L)1 Blockade in NSCLC

Matthew D. Hellmann, Barzin Y. Nabet, Hira Rizvi, Aadel A. Chaudhuri, Daniel K. Wells, Mark P.S. Dunphy, Jacob J. Chabon, Chih Long Liu, Angela B. Hui, Kathryn C. Arbour, Jia Luo, Isabel R. Preeshagul, Everett J. Moding, Diego Almanza, Rene F. Bonilla, Jennifer L. Sauter, Hyejin Choi, Megan Tenet, Mohsen Abu-Akeel, Andrew J. PlodkowskiRocio Perez Johnston, Christopher H. Yoo, Ryan B. Ko, Henning Stehr, Linda Gojenola, Heather A. Wakelee, Sukhmani K. Padda, Joel W. Neal, Jamie E. Chaft, Mark G. Kris, Charles M. Rudin, Taha Merghoub, Bob T. Li, Ash A. Alizadeh, Maximilian Diehn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Scopus citations


Purpose: Treatment with PD-(L)1 blockade can produce remarkably durable responses in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a significant fraction of long-term responders ultimately progress and predictors of late progression are unknown. We hypothesized that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis of long-term responders to PD-(L)1 blockade may differentiate those who will achieve ongoing benefit from those at risk of eventual progression. Experimental Design: In patients with advanced NSCLC achieving long-term benefit from PD-(L)1 blockade (progression-free survival ≥ 12 months), plasma was collected at a surveillance timepoint late during/after treatment to interrogate ctDNA by Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing. Tumor tissue was available for 24 patients and was profiled by whole-exome sequencing (n = 18) or by targeted sequencing (n = 6). Results: Thirty-one patients with NSCLC with long-term benefit to PD-(L)1 blockade were identified, and ctDNA was analyzed in surveillance blood samples collected at a median of 26.7 months after initiation of therapy. Nine patients also had baseline plasma samples available, and all had detectable ctDNA prior to therapy initiation. At the surveillance timepoint, 27 patients had undetectable ctDNA and 25 (93%) have remained progression-free; in contrast, all 4 patients with detectable ctDNA eventually progressed [Fisher P < 0.0001; positive predictive value = 1, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51–1; negative predictive value = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80–0.99)]. Conclusions: ctDNA analysis can noninvasively identify minimal residual disease in patients with long-term responses to PD-(L)1 blockade and predict the risk of eventual progression. If validated, ctDNA surveillance may facilitate personalization of the duration of immune checkpoint blockade and enable early intervention in patients at high risk for progression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2849-2858
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jun 15 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis to Assess Risk of Progression after Long-term Response to PD-(L)1 Blockade in NSCLC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this