TY - JOUR
T1 - Cimetidine and adverse reactions
T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of short-term therapy
AU - Richter, James M.
AU - Colditz, Graham A.
AU - Huse, Daniel M.
AU - Delea, Thomas E.
AU - Oster, Gerry
PY - 1989/9
Y1 - 1989/9
N2 - Purpose: We pooled data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine the frequency of adverse reactions among patients treated with cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders. Methods: Meta-analysis was used to analyze data obtained from a search of English language reports of trials of cimetidine in the ambulatory treatment of acute acid-peptic disorders that were published between January 1982 and April 1987. Results: Of 161 trials of cimetidine that we identified, 84 provided complete reporting of data on adverse reactions and, of these, 24 employed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Across these 24 trials, the overall rate of reported adverse reactions among 622 patients randomly assigned to receive cimetidine was 10.9%; the corresponding rate among 516 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo was 10.1%. This difference was not statistically significant (p >0.10), nor were any significant differences noted in the frequencies of reported central nervous system or gastrointestinal adverse reactions (p >0.10). Rates of adverse reactions also did not differ by dosage or trial duration. The overall rate of adverse reactions reported in the 60 trials that did not utilize a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was similar to the rate reported in those that did. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the frequency of adverse reactions among patients receiving cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders is not significantly different from that of patients receiving placebo.
AB - Purpose: We pooled data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine the frequency of adverse reactions among patients treated with cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders. Methods: Meta-analysis was used to analyze data obtained from a search of English language reports of trials of cimetidine in the ambulatory treatment of acute acid-peptic disorders that were published between January 1982 and April 1987. Results: Of 161 trials of cimetidine that we identified, 84 provided complete reporting of data on adverse reactions and, of these, 24 employed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Across these 24 trials, the overall rate of reported adverse reactions among 622 patients randomly assigned to receive cimetidine was 10.9%; the corresponding rate among 516 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo was 10.1%. This difference was not statistically significant (p >0.10), nor were any significant differences noted in the frequencies of reported central nervous system or gastrointestinal adverse reactions (p >0.10). Rates of adverse reactions also did not differ by dosage or trial duration. The overall rate of adverse reactions reported in the 60 trials that did not utilize a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was similar to the rate reported in those that did. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the frequency of adverse reactions among patients receiving cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders is not significantly different from that of patients receiving placebo.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024454944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9343(89)80151-2
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9343(89)80151-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 2773966
AN - SCOPUS:0024454944
SN - 0002-9343
VL - 87
SP - 278
EP - 284
JO - The American journal of medicine
JF - The American journal of medicine
IS - 3
ER -