TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic vagus nerve stimulation significantly improves quality of life in treatment-resistant major depression
AU - Conway, Charles R.
AU - Kumar, Arun
AU - Xiong, Willa
AU - Bunker, Mark
AU - Aaronson, Scott T.
AU - Rush, A. John
N1 - Funding Information:
Submitted: February 9, 2018; accepted July 3, 2018. Published online: August 21, 2018. Potential conflicts of interest: Dr Conway has previously received research support from LivaNova and Bristol-Myers Squibb. He currently receives research support from the Stanley Medical Research Institute, the National Institute of Mental Health, NeoSync Inc, The Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, The August Busch IV Foundation, and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation. He previously received speaking fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Otsuka. He serves as a research design consultant to LivaNova. He is a part-time employee of the John Cochran Veterans Administration Hospital in St. Louis. Drs Kumar and Bunker are employees of LivaNova. Dr Aaronson has received consulting fees from Janssen, Genomind, Alkermes, Neuronetics and LivaNova; speaking fees from Otsuka, Neurocrine and Sunovion; and research funding from Neuronetics. Dr Rush has received consulting fees from Akili, Brain Resource, Compass,
Funding Information:
MindLinc,; Sunovion, Taj Medical, and Takeda USA; 5. Englot DJ, Hassnain KH, Rolston JD, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, royalties from Guilford Publications and University Quality-of-life metrics with vagus nerve and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas stimulation for epilepsy from provider survey Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337–350.PubMed CrossRef (for the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms and its data. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;66:4–9.PubMed CrossRef Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. derivatives); and speaking fees from LivaNova and is Kossoff EH, Pyzik PL. Improvement in alertness Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed also the co-inventor on US Patent No. 7,795,033 and and behavior in children treated with outpatients requiring one or several US Patent No. 7,906,283. Dr Xiong has no conflicts combination topiramate and vagus nerve treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J of interest to report. stimulation.EpilepsyBehav.2004;5(2):256–259.PubMedCrossRef Psychiatry.2006;163(11):1905–1917.PubMedCrossRef Funding/support:Research reported in this 7. Shahwan A, Bailey C, Maxiner W, et al. Vagus Dunner DL, Aaronson ST, Sackeim HA, et al. A publication was supported by Cyberonics, Inc. nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in multisite, naturalistic, observational study of (LivaNova, PLC), Houston, Texas. children: more to VNS than seizure frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients Roleofthesponsor:LivaNovaPLC(formerly reduction. Epilepsia. 2009;50(5):1220–1228.PubMed CrossRef with pharmacoresistant major depressive Cyberonics, Inc.) sponsored the patient registry 8. Borckardt JJ, Kozel FA, Anderson B, et al. Vagus disorder: durability of benefit over a 1-year through contracts to investigative sites. The study nerve stimulation affects pain perception in follow-upperiod.J Clin Psychiatry. sponsor collaborated on the design ofthe study. depressed adults. Pain Res Manag. 2014;75(12):1394–1401.PubMed CrossRef Statistical analyses were performed by the sponsor 2005;10(1):9–14.PubMed CrossRef Conway CR, George MS, Sackeim HA. Toward and reviewed by the senior author and other 9. Clark KB, Naritoku DK, Smith DC, et al. an evidence-based, operational definition of contributing authors. The sponsor also collaborated Enhanced recognition memory following treatment-resistant depression: when enough with the other authors in data interpretation. vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects. is enough. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(1):9–10.PubMed CrossRef Although staff at LivaNova reviewed the Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(1):94–98.PubMed CrossRef Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, et al. A manuscript, the decision to submit the manuscript 10. Sackeim HA, Keilp JG, Rush AJ, et al. The effects prospective, randomized, double-blind was the collective decision of all ofthe authors. of vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive comparison of bilateral and right unilateral performance in patients with treatment-electroconvulsive therapy at different Acknowledgments:The authors thank Bryan Olin, resistant depression. Neuropsychiatry stimulus intensities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. PhD, and Giacomo Mordenti, MS, both employees NeuropsycholBehavNeurol.2001;14(1):53–62.PubMed 2000;57(5):425–434.PubMedCrossRef of LivaNova PLC, London, UK, for their statistical 11. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, et al. The Richieri R, Guedj E, Michel P, et al. Maintenance insights. They also thank Britt Gott, MS, for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces providing editorial comments, and Al Janski, PhD, standard become a lead weight? Am J depression relapse: a propensity-adjusted for intellectual input. Both Ms Gott and Dr Janski Psychiatry. 2004;161(12):2163–2177.PubMed CrossRef analysis. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(1):129–135.PubMed CrossRef are employees of Washington University in St Louis. 12. Endicott J, Rajagopalan K, Minkwitz M, et al; Nahas Z, Teneback C, Chae JH, et al. Serial Neitherhaveanyfinancialdisclosures. BOLDER Study Group. A randomized, double-vagus nerve stimulation functional MRI in Supplementary material: Available at blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine treatment-resistant depression.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Objective: To compare quality-of-life (QOL) change associated with treatment as usual (TAU, any antidepressant treatment) versus adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation treatment (VNS + TAU) in a population of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) for 5 years. Methods: Self-reported QOL assessments, using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), were gathered in a multicenter, longitudinal registry (January 2006- May 2015) comparing the antidepressant efficacy of VNS + TAU versus TAU in TRD. All depressed patients (N = 599), with either unipolar or bipolar depression, met DSM-IV-TR major depressive episode criteria and failed at least 4 adequate antidepressant trials. The Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was administered by blinded raters. Q-LES-Q-SF scores in the treatment arms were compared via linear regression; linear regression was employed to compare QOL differences with percent decrease in MADRS. A subanalysis comparing Q-LES-Q-SF functional domain change was performed. Results: 328 VNS + TAU and 271 TAU patients with TRD were compared. On average, VNS + TAU demonstrated a significant, comparative QOL advantage over TAU (as demonstrated via nonoverlapping 95% confidence bands) that began at 3 months and was sustained through 5 years and was reinforced using a clinical global improvement measure. Patients receiving VNS + TAU, but not TAU alone, demonstrated a clinically meaningful QOL improvement (34% MADRS decrease) well below the classically defined antidepressant response (50% MADRS decrease). Exploratory post hoc subanalysis demonstrated that VNS + TAU had a significant advantage in multiple Q-LES-Q domains. Conclusion: Compared to TAU, adjunctive VNS significantly improved QOL in TRD, and this QOL advantage was sustained. Further, TRD patients treated with VNS experienced clinically meaningful QOL improvements even with depression symptom reduction less than the conventional 50% reduction used to ascribe "response.".
AB - Objective: To compare quality-of-life (QOL) change associated with treatment as usual (TAU, any antidepressant treatment) versus adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation treatment (VNS + TAU) in a population of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) for 5 years. Methods: Self-reported QOL assessments, using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), were gathered in a multicenter, longitudinal registry (January 2006- May 2015) comparing the antidepressant efficacy of VNS + TAU versus TAU in TRD. All depressed patients (N = 599), with either unipolar or bipolar depression, met DSM-IV-TR major depressive episode criteria and failed at least 4 adequate antidepressant trials. The Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was administered by blinded raters. Q-LES-Q-SF scores in the treatment arms were compared via linear regression; linear regression was employed to compare QOL differences with percent decrease in MADRS. A subanalysis comparing Q-LES-Q-SF functional domain change was performed. Results: 328 VNS + TAU and 271 TAU patients with TRD were compared. On average, VNS + TAU demonstrated a significant, comparative QOL advantage over TAU (as demonstrated via nonoverlapping 95% confidence bands) that began at 3 months and was sustained through 5 years and was reinforced using a clinical global improvement measure. Patients receiving VNS + TAU, but not TAU alone, demonstrated a clinically meaningful QOL improvement (34% MADRS decrease) well below the classically defined antidepressant response (50% MADRS decrease). Exploratory post hoc subanalysis demonstrated that VNS + TAU had a significant advantage in multiple Q-LES-Q domains. Conclusion: Compared to TAU, adjunctive VNS significantly improved QOL in TRD, and this QOL advantage was sustained. Further, TRD patients treated with VNS experienced clinically meaningful QOL improvements even with depression symptom reduction less than the conventional 50% reduction used to ascribe "response.".
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055861969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.18m12178
DO - 10.4088/JCP.18m12178
M3 - Article
C2 - 30152645
AN - SCOPUS:85055861969
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 79
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 5
M1 - 18m12178
ER -