TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing 3D printing in the fabrication of variable density phantoms for quality assurance of radiotherapy
AU - Madamesila, Joseph
AU - McGeachy, Philip
AU - Villarreal Barajas, J. Eduardo
AU - Khan, Rao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Purpose: To present characterization, process flow, and applications of 3D fabricated low density phantoms for radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). Material and methods: A Rostock 3D printer using polystyrene was employed to print slabs of varying relative electron densities (0.18-0.75). A CT scan was used to calibrate infill-to-density and characterize uniformity of the print. Two printed low relative density rods (0.18, 0.52) were benchmarked against a commercial CT-electron-density phantom. Density scaling of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) was tested with EBT3 film for a 0.57 slab. Gamma criterion of 3% and 3 mm was used for analysis. Results: 3D printed slabs demonstrated uniformity for densities 0.4-0.75. The printed 0.52 rod had close agreement with the commercial phantom. Dosimetric comparison for 0.57 density slab showed >95% agreement between calculation and measurements. Conclusion: 3D printing allows fabrication of variable density phantoms for QA needs of a small clinic.
AB - Purpose: To present characterization, process flow, and applications of 3D fabricated low density phantoms for radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). Material and methods: A Rostock 3D printer using polystyrene was employed to print slabs of varying relative electron densities (0.18-0.75). A CT scan was used to calibrate infill-to-density and characterize uniformity of the print. Two printed low relative density rods (0.18, 0.52) were benchmarked against a commercial CT-electron-density phantom. Density scaling of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) was tested with EBT3 film for a 0.57 slab. Gamma criterion of 3% and 3 mm was used for analysis. Results: 3D printed slabs demonstrated uniformity for densities 0.4-0.75. The printed 0.52 rod had close agreement with the commercial phantom. Dosimetric comparison for 0.57 density slab showed >95% agreement between calculation and measurements. Conclusion: 3D printing allows fabrication of variable density phantoms for QA needs of a small clinic.
KW - 3D printing
KW - Desktop phantom fabrication
KW - Dose calculation algorithm
KW - Experimental verification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950976329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 26508016
AN - SCOPUS:84950976329
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 32
SP - 242
EP - 247
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
IS - 1
ER -