Changing horses in wartime? the 2004 presidential election

  • Herbert F. Weisberg
  • , Dino P. Christenson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The literature makes clear that foreign policy affects voting, but it does not lead to clear expectations as to how a war will affect voting. Will views about the advisability of the war predominate? Or will the indirect effect through the incumbent's image be more important? Will a war crowd out other potential issues, particularly domestic ones? This paper addresses these questions through a series of focused analyses of NES survey data. We find that an increase in strong Republican partisans clinched the election for President Bush. The Iraq War was not a direct vote gainer for the President, but the larger War on Terrorism burnished his image as a leader, at least long enough to win the election. Likewise, the cultural war allowed President Bush to retain some of the votes that he might otherwise have lost due to the unpopularity of the Iraq War.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)279-304
    Number of pages26
    JournalPolitical Behavior
    Volume29
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2007

    Keywords

    • 2004 election
    • Foreign policy
    • Presidential election
    • Voting
    • War

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Changing horses in wartime? the 2004 presidential election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this