TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes and challenges in the residency application process in obstetrics and gynecology
AU - Undergraduate Medicine Education Committee
AU - Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics
AU - Chen, Katherine T.
AU - Royce, Celeste S.
AU - Baecher-Lind, Laura
AU - Bhargava, Rashmi
AU - Fleming, Angela
AU - Morgan, Helen Kang
AU - Morosky, Christopher M.
AU - Schaffir, Jonathan A.
AU - Sims, Shireen Madani
AU - Sonn, Tammy
AU - Sutton, Jill M.
AU - Stephenson-Famy, Alyssa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Faculty career advisors who guide applicants applying to obstetrics and gynecology residency programs need updated information and resources, given the constant changes and challenges to the residency application process. Initial changes included standardization of the application timeline and interview processes. More recent changes included the utilization of a standardized letter of evaluation, initiation of program signaling, second look visit guidelines, and updated sections in the Electronic Residency Application Service. Challenges in advising include the unmatched applicant and the applicant who is couples matching in the era of program signaling. Additional considerations include applying with the current status of reproductive health law restrictions and preparing for a new residency application platform. The Undergraduate Medical Education Committee of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics provides this updated guide of the prior 2021 resource for advisors to increase confidence in advising students, boost professional fulfillment with advising activities, and aid in satisfaction with advising resources. This guide covers the continuing challenges and future opportunities in the resident application process.
AB - Faculty career advisors who guide applicants applying to obstetrics and gynecology residency programs need updated information and resources, given the constant changes and challenges to the residency application process. Initial changes included standardization of the application timeline and interview processes. More recent changes included the utilization of a standardized letter of evaluation, initiation of program signaling, second look visit guidelines, and updated sections in the Electronic Residency Application Service. Challenges in advising include the unmatched applicant and the applicant who is couples matching in the era of program signaling. Additional considerations include applying with the current status of reproductive health law restrictions and preparing for a new residency application platform. The Undergraduate Medical Education Committee of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics provides this updated guide of the prior 2021 resource for advisors to increase confidence in advising students, boost professional fulfillment with advising activities, and aid in satisfaction with advising resources. This guide covers the continuing challenges and future opportunities in the resident application process.
KW - away rotations
KW - obstetrics and gynecology residency
KW - program signaling
KW - residency application platform
KW - residency application process
KW - residency program application
KW - standardized letter of evaluation
KW - undergraduate medical education career advising
KW - virtual interviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196015199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.045
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.045
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38801933
AN - SCOPUS:85196015199
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 231
SP - 475
EP - 479
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 5
ER -