TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges at the APOE locus
T2 - a robust quality control approach for accurate APOE genotyping
AU - for the European Alzheimer & Dementia BioBank (EADB)
AU - Belloy, Michael E.
AU - Eger, Sarah J.
AU - Le Guen, Yann
AU - Damotte, Vincent
AU - Ahmad, Shahzad
AU - Ikram, M. Arfan
AU - Ramirez, Alfredo
AU - Tsolaki, Anthoula C.
AU - Rossi, Giacomina
AU - Jansen, Iris E.
AU - de Rojas, Itziar
AU - Parveen, Kayenat
AU - Sleegers, Kristel
AU - Ingelsson, Martin
AU - Hiltunen, Mikko
AU - Amin, Najaf
AU - Andreassen, Ole
AU - Sánchez-Juan, Pascual
AU - Kehoe, Patrick
AU - Amouyel, Philippe
AU - Sims, Rebecca
AU - Frikke-Schmidt, Ruth
AU - van der Flier, Wiesje M.
AU - Lambert, Jean Charles
AU - He, Zihuai
AU - Han, Summer S.
AU - Napolioni, Valerio
AU - Greicius, Michael D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Genetic variants within the APOE locus may modulate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk independently or in conjunction with APOE*2/3/4 genotypes. Identifying such variants and mechanisms would importantly advance our understanding of APOE pathophysiology and provide critical guidance for AD therapies aimed at APOE. The APOE locus however remains relatively poorly understood in AD, owing to multiple challenges that include its complex linkage structure and uncertainty in APOE*2/3/4 genotype quality. Here, we present a novel APOE*2/3/4 filtering approach and showcase its relevance on AD risk association analyses for the rs439401 variant, which is located 1801 base pairs downstream of APOE and has been associated with a potential regulatory effect on APOE. Methods: We used thirty-two AD-related cohorts, with genetic data from various high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Study participants were filtered to be ages 60 and older, non-Hispanic, of European ancestry, and diagnosed as cognitively normal or AD (n = 65,701). Primary analyses investigated AD risk in APOE*4/4 carriers. Additional supporting analyses were performed in APOE*3/4 and 3/3 strata. Outcomes were compared under two different APOE*2/3/4 filtering approaches. Results: Using more conventional APOE*2/3/4 filtering criteria (approach 1), we showed that, when in-phase with APOE*4, rs439401 was variably associated with protective effects on AD case-control status. However, when applying a novel filter that increases the certainty of the APOE*2/3/4 genotypes by applying more stringent criteria for concordance between the provided APOE genotype and imputed APOE genotype (approach 2), we observed that all significant effects were lost. Conclusions: We showed that careful consideration of APOE genotype and appropriate sample filtering were crucial to robustly interrogate the role of the APOE locus on AD risk. Our study presents a novel APOE filtering approach and provides important guidelines for research into the APOE locus, as well as for elucidating genetic interaction effects with APOE*2/3/4.
AB - Background: Genetic variants within the APOE locus may modulate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk independently or in conjunction with APOE*2/3/4 genotypes. Identifying such variants and mechanisms would importantly advance our understanding of APOE pathophysiology and provide critical guidance for AD therapies aimed at APOE. The APOE locus however remains relatively poorly understood in AD, owing to multiple challenges that include its complex linkage structure and uncertainty in APOE*2/3/4 genotype quality. Here, we present a novel APOE*2/3/4 filtering approach and showcase its relevance on AD risk association analyses for the rs439401 variant, which is located 1801 base pairs downstream of APOE and has been associated with a potential regulatory effect on APOE. Methods: We used thirty-two AD-related cohorts, with genetic data from various high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Study participants were filtered to be ages 60 and older, non-Hispanic, of European ancestry, and diagnosed as cognitively normal or AD (n = 65,701). Primary analyses investigated AD risk in APOE*4/4 carriers. Additional supporting analyses were performed in APOE*3/4 and 3/3 strata. Outcomes were compared under two different APOE*2/3/4 filtering approaches. Results: Using more conventional APOE*2/3/4 filtering criteria (approach 1), we showed that, when in-phase with APOE*4, rs439401 was variably associated with protective effects on AD case-control status. However, when applying a novel filter that increases the certainty of the APOE*2/3/4 genotypes by applying more stringent criteria for concordance between the provided APOE genotype and imputed APOE genotype (approach 2), we observed that all significant effects were lost. Conclusions: We showed that careful consideration of APOE genotype and appropriate sample filtering were crucial to robustly interrogate the role of the APOE locus on AD risk. Our study presents a novel APOE filtering approach and provides important guidelines for research into the APOE locus, as well as for elucidating genetic interaction effects with APOE*2/3/4.
KW - Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
KW - Apolipoprotein E (APOE)
KW - Genetics
KW - Haplotypes
KW - Novel approaches
KW - rs439401
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124172825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13195-022-00962-4
DO - 10.1186/s13195-022-00962-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 35120553
AN - SCOPUS:85124172825
SN - 1758-9193
VL - 14
JO - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
JF - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 22
ER -