TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebral oxygen extraction fraction (OEF)
T2 - Comparison of challenge-free gradient echo QSM+qBOLD (QQ) with 15O PET in healthy adults
AU - Cho, Junghun
AU - Lee, John
AU - An, Hongyu
AU - Goyal, Manu S.
AU - Su, Yi
AU - Wang, Yi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - We aimed to validate oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) estimations by quantitative susceptibility mapping plus quantitative blood oxygen-level dependence (QSM+qBOLD, or QQ) using 15O-PET. In ten healthy adult brains, PET and MRI were acquired simultaneously on a PET/MR scanner. PET was acquired using C[15O], O[15O], and H2[15O]. Image-derived arterial input functions and standard models of oxygen metabolism provided quantification of PET. MRI included T1-weighted imaging, time-of-flight angiography, and multi-echo gradient-echo imaging that was processed for QQ. Region of interest (ROI) analyses compared PET OEF and QQ OEF. In ROI analyses, the averaged OEF differences between PET and QQ were generally small and statistically insignificant. For whole brains, the average and standard deviation of OEF was 32.8 ± 6.7% for PET; OEF was 34.2 ± 2.6% for QQ. Bland-Altman plots quantified agreement between PET OEF and QQ OEF. The interval between the 95% limits of agreement was 16.9 ± 4.0% for whole brains. Our validation study suggests that respiratory challenge-free QQ-OEF mapping may be useful for non-invasive clinical assessment of regional OEF impairment.
AB - We aimed to validate oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) estimations by quantitative susceptibility mapping plus quantitative blood oxygen-level dependence (QSM+qBOLD, or QQ) using 15O-PET. In ten healthy adult brains, PET and MRI were acquired simultaneously on a PET/MR scanner. PET was acquired using C[15O], O[15O], and H2[15O]. Image-derived arterial input functions and standard models of oxygen metabolism provided quantification of PET. MRI included T1-weighted imaging, time-of-flight angiography, and multi-echo gradient-echo imaging that was processed for QQ. Region of interest (ROI) analyses compared PET OEF and QQ OEF. In ROI analyses, the averaged OEF differences between PET and QQ were generally small and statistically insignificant. For whole brains, the average and standard deviation of OEF was 32.8 ± 6.7% for PET; OEF was 34.2 ± 2.6% for QQ. Bland-Altman plots quantified agreement between PET OEF and QQ OEF. The interval between the 95% limits of agreement was 16.9 ± 4.0% for whole brains. Our validation study suggests that respiratory challenge-free QQ-OEF mapping may be useful for non-invasive clinical assessment of regional OEF impairment.
KW - Oxygen extraction fraction
KW - QSM+qBOLD
KW - positron emission tomography
KW - quantitative blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging
KW - quantitative susceptibility mapping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096821576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0271678X20973951
DO - 10.1177/0271678X20973951
M3 - Article
C2 - 33243071
AN - SCOPUS:85096821576
SN - 0271-678X
VL - 41
SP - 1658
EP - 1668
JO - Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
IS - 7
ER -