Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV evaluation performed by minimally trained non-laboratory operators in a CLIA-waived environment

  • Bashar S. Shihabuddin
  • , Matthew L. Faron
  • , Ryan F. Relich
  • , Paul Van Heukelom
  • , Donna Mayne
  • , Mary Allen Staat
  • , Rangaraj Selvarangan
  • , Leslie A. Hueschen
  • , Donna M. Wolk
  • , Stacey House
  • , Glenn Harnett
  • , Kevin McGann
  • , Mark T. Steele
  • , Jose R. Romero
  • , Joe Arms
  • , Owen Lander
  • , Michael Loeffelholz
  • , Fiona Strouts
  • , Daniel Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of readily available and easily performed viral testing for surveillance during future infectious pandemics. The objectives of this study were: to assess the performance of the Xpert Xpress Flu and/or RSV test, a multiplex PCR assay for detecting influenza A and B virus and respiratory syncytial virus nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens, relative to the Quidel Lyra Influenza A+B assay and the Prodesse ProFlu+ assay, and the system's ease of use by minimally trained operators. Overall, the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV test demonstrated a high positive and negative percent agreement with the comparator assays, and was easy to use and interpret results, based on the operators’ feedback. We concluded that the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV test is sensitive, specific, and easy to use for the diagnosis of influenza and RSV by minimally trained operators and can be a valuable tool in future infectious clusters or pandemics.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115764
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • CLIA-Waved Environment
  • Influenza
  • Multiplex real-time PCR test
  • RSV

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV evaluation performed by minimally trained non-laboratory operators in a CLIA-waived environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this