Central aortic pressure is independently associated with diastolic function

Sumeet Subherwal, Lisa de las Fuentes, Alan D. Waggoner, Sharon Heuerman, Karen E. Spence, Victor G. Davila-Roman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations


Background: Studies investigating the association between central aortic pressures and diastolic function have been limited. Methods: Consecutive ambulatory patients (n = 281, mean age 49 ± 13 years, 49% male) with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function were included. The LV filling pressure (E/Em) was estimated by Doppler-derived ratio of mitral inflow velocity (E) to septal (Em) by tissue Doppler, LV relaxation by Em, and central aortic pressures by radial tonometry. Central aortic systolic (cSBP), diastolic (cDBP), mean (cMAP) and pulse pressure (cPP) were entered individually into stepwise linear regression models to determine their association with E/Em or Em. Results: In univariate analysis, cPP correlated most strongly with E/Em (Spearman's ρ = 0.45, P < .001), whereas cSBP correlated most strongly with Em (Spearman's ρ = -0.51, P < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the pulsatile component of afterload, cPP, contributed most to E/Em (partial r2 = 23%); meanwhile, the nonpulsatile components (cDBP and cMAP) were significant but small contributors (partial r2 of 6% and 5%, respectively) of LV relaxation (Em). Conclusion: The nonpulsatile components of aortic afterload (cMAP and cDBP) exhibited a weak but significant association with LV relaxation, whereas the pulsatile component of afterload, cPP, exhibited strong association with LV filling pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1081-1088
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican heart journal
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Central aortic pressure is independently associated with diastolic function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this