TY - JOUR
T1 - cDC1 prime and are licensed by CD4+ T cells to induce anti-tumour immunity
AU - Ferris, Stephen T.
AU - Durai, Vivek
AU - Wu, Renee
AU - Theisen, Derek J.
AU - Ward, Jeffrey P.
AU - Bern, Michael D.
AU - Davidson, Jesse T.
AU - Bagadia, Prachi
AU - Liu, Tiantian
AU - Briseño, Carlos G.
AU - Li, Lijin
AU - Gillanders, William E.
AU - Wu, Gregory F.
AU - Yokoyama, Wayne M.
AU - Murphy, Theresa L.
AU - Schreiber, Robert D.
AU - Murphy, Kenneth M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements K.M.M. was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the US National Institutes of Health (R01AI150297); R.D.S. by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01CA190700) and The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and a Stand Up To Cancer–Lustgarden Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Foundation Convergence Team Translational Research Grant; W.M.Y. by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI129545); M.D.B. and V.D. by fellowship grants from the National Institutes of Health (F30DK112466 and F30DK108498, respectively); S.T.F. by a postdoctoral training grant from the National Institutes of Health (T32CA95473); G.F.W., D.J.T. and J.T.D. by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS106289, T32 AI007163 and T32CA009621, respectively); and P.B. by the US National Science Foundation (DGE-1143954). We thank the Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, for help with genomic analysis. The Center is supported by Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA91842 from the US National Cancer Institute and by Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences/Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1 TR000448 from the US National Center for Research Resources. Aspects of studies including tetramer production were performed with assistance by the Immunomonitoring Laboratory, which is supported by the Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs and the Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center that, in turn, is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA91842) and the Washington University Rheumatic Diseases Research Resource-based Center Grant (P30AR073752).
Funding Information:
Irf8 +32–/–mice, which are homozygous for the deletion of an downstream enhancer element of Irf8, were generated in house and described previously30. IAβbstopf/f (MHCIILSL)34 mice were provided by G. Wu (Washington University, St Louis, MO). Mice harbouring floxed alleles of β2-microglobulin (β2mfl/fl)32were provided by W. Yokoyama (Washington University, St Louis, MO). MHCI TKO mice (Kb−/−Db−/−β2m−/−) were originally provided by T. Hansen (Washington University, St Louis, MO)47. C57Bl/6J (B6), MHCIIfl (B6.129X1-H2-Ab1tm1Koni/J), C57Bl/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mb/J (OT-I), C57Bl/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)425Cbn/J (OT-II), B6.129X1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/ J (R26LSLYFP), B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ (CD45.1), B6.129S2-H2dlAb1-Ea/ J (MHCII−/−) and B6.129S4-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(FLP1)Dym/RainJ (R26FLP) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. CD45.1 mice were bred to OT-I and OT-II mice to produce CD45.1 OT-I and CD45.1 OT-II, respectively. The Cd40tm1a(KOMP)Wtsimouse used for this project was generated by the trans-NIH Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP) and obtained from the KOMP Repository (www.komp.org).NIH grants to Velocigene at Regen-eron Inc (U01HG004085) and the CSD Consortium (U01HG004080) funded the generation of gene-targeted ES cells for 8,500 genes in the KOMP Program and archived and distributed by the KOMP Repository at UC Davis and CHORI (U42RR024244). The Cd40tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi trapping cassette “SA-βgeo-pA” (splice acceptor-beta-geo-polyA) flanked by Flp-recombinase target FRT sites was converted to a conditional allele by breeding to R26FLP mice. The resulting mice lack the gene trap cassette, leaving two loxP sites flanking exons 2–4 of Cd40 (Cd40fl). The resultant Cd40fl mice were subsequently used in experiments where indicated. Xcr1Cre mice with germline deletion of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHCI), MHCII or CD40 were excluded from our study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2020/8/27
Y1 - 2020/8/27
N2 - Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1)1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8+ T cells2,3, whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4+ T cells4,5. CD4+ T cells are also considered to help CD8+ T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms6–11, including a process whereby CD4+ T cells ‘license’ cDC1 for CD8+ T cell priming12. However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8+ T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4+ T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4+ T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4+ T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8+ T cell priming, but also for initial CD4+ T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.
AB - Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1)1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8+ T cells2,3, whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4+ T cells4,5. CD4+ T cells are also considered to help CD8+ T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms6–11, including a process whereby CD4+ T cells ‘license’ cDC1 for CD8+ T cell priming12. However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8+ T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4+ T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4+ T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4+ T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8+ T cell priming, but also for initial CD4+ T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089311605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-020-2611-3
DO - 10.1038/s41586-020-2611-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 32788723
AN - SCOPUS:85089311605
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 584
SP - 624
EP - 629
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 7822
ER -