TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiovascular Therapies Targeting Left Atrial Appendage
AU - Turagam, Mohit K.
AU - Velagapudi, Poonam
AU - Kar, Saibal
AU - Holmes, David
AU - Reddy, Vivek Y.
AU - Refaat, Marwan M.
AU - Di Biase, Luigi
AU - Al-Ahmed, Amin
AU - Chung, Mina K.
AU - Lewalter, Thorsten
AU - Edgerton, James
AU - Cox, James
AU - Fisher, John
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2018/7/24
Y1 - 2018/7/24
N2 - Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has evolved as an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered suitable for oral anticoagulation. There is strong evidence based on randomized clinical trials with 1 percutaneous device, as well as a large registry experience with several devices, regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy. In addition, there is encouraging data regarding the effect of epicardial LAA closure on decreasing arrhythmia burden and improvements in systemic homeostasis by neurohormonal modulation. However, there are several unresolved issues regarding optimal patient selection, device selection, management of periprocedural complications including device-related thrombus, residual leaks, and pericarditis. In this review, we summarize the rationale, evidence, optimal patient selection, and common challenges encountered with mechanical LAA exclusion.
AB - Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has evolved as an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are considered suitable for oral anticoagulation. There is strong evidence based on randomized clinical trials with 1 percutaneous device, as well as a large registry experience with several devices, regarding the safety and efficacy of this strategy. In addition, there is encouraging data regarding the effect of epicardial LAA closure on decreasing arrhythmia burden and improvements in systemic homeostasis by neurohormonal modulation. However, there are several unresolved issues regarding optimal patient selection, device selection, management of periprocedural complications including device-related thrombus, residual leaks, and pericarditis. In this review, we summarize the rationale, evidence, optimal patient selection, and common challenges encountered with mechanical LAA exclusion.
KW - anticoagulants
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - cardiac surgical procedures
KW - stroke
KW - thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048927602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.048
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.048
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29954658
AN - SCOPUS:85048927602
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 72
SP - 448
EP - 463
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -