Candidate Gene–Environment Interaction Research: Reflections and Recommendations

Danielle M. Dick, Arpana Agrawal, Matthew C. Keller, Amy Adkins, Fazil Aliev, Scott Monroe, John K. Hewitt, Kenneth S. Kendler, Kenneth J. Sher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

235 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studying how genetic predispositions come together with environmental factors to contribute to complex behavioral outcomes has great potential for advancing the understanding of the development of psychopathology. It represents a clear theoretical advance over studying these factors in isolation. However, research at the intersection of multiple fields creates many challenges. We review several reasons why the rapidly expanding candidate gene–environment interaction (cG×E) literature should be considered with a degree of caution. We discuss lessons learned about candidate gene main effects from the evolving genetics literature and how these inform the study of cG×E. We review the importance of the measurement of the gene and environment of interest in cG×E studies. We discuss statistical concerns with modeling cG×E that are frequently overlooked. Furthermore, we review other challenges that have likely contributed to the cG×E literature being difficult to interpret, including low power and publication bias. Many of these issues are similar to other concerns about research integrity (e.g., high false-positive rates) that have received increasing attention in the social sciences. We provide recommendations for rigorous research practices for cG×E studies that we believe will advance its potential to contribute more robustly to the understanding of complex behavioral phenotypes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-59
Number of pages23
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 21 2015

Keywords

  • G×E
  • candidate genes
  • genetics
  • gene–environment interaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Candidate Gene–Environment Interaction Research: Reflections and Recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this