Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?

George A. Macones, Alison G. Cahill, David M. Stamilio, Anthony Odibo, Jeffrey Peipert, Erika J. Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations


Objective: This study was undertaken to use multivariable methods to develop clinical predictive models for the occurrence of uterine rupture by using both antepartum and early intrapartum factors. Study design: This was a planned secondary analysis from a multicenter case-control study of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery. Multivariable methods were used to develop 2 separate clinical predictive indices-one that used only prelabor factors and the other that used both prelabor and early labor factors. These indices were also assessed with the use of Receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: We identified 134 cases of uterine rupture and 665 noncases. No single individual factor is sufficiently sensitive or specific for clinical prediction of uterine rupture. Likewise, the 2 clinical predictive indices were neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for clinical use (receiver operating characteristic curve [area under the curve] 0.67 and 0.70, respectively). Conclusion: Uterine rupture cannot be predicted with either individual or combinations of clinical factors. This has important clinical and medical-legal implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1148-1152
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2006


  • Uterine rupture
  • VBAC


Dive into the research topics of 'Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this