TY - GEN
T1 - Calculation of radiomic features to validate the textural realism of physical anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography
AU - Acciavatti, Raymond J.
AU - Cohen, Eric A.
AU - Haji Maghsoudi, Omid
AU - Gastounioti, Aimilia
AU - Pantalone, Lauren
AU - Hsieh, Meng Kang
AU - Barufaldi, Bruno
AU - Bakic, Predrag R.
AU - Chen, Jinbo
AU - Conant, Emily F.
AU - Kontos, Despina
AU - Maidment, Andrew D.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support was provided by the following grants: R01CA207084 and U54CA163313 from the National Institute of Health, W81XWH-18-1-0082 from the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program, and PDF17479714 from Susan G. Komen®. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Funding Information:
ADAM receives research support from Hologic Inc., Barco NV, and Analogic Corporation. Also, ADAM is a shareholder and member of the scientific advisory board of Real Time Tomography, LLC. EFC receives grant support and is part of the advisory panel of Hologic Inc. EFC also receives grant support and is part of the advisory panel of iCAD Inc.
Funding Information:
Support was provided by the following grants: R01CA207084 and U54CA163313 from the National Institute of Health, W81XWH-18-1-0082 from the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program, and PDF17479714 from Susan G. Komen? . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 SPIE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this paper, radiomic features are used to validate the textural realism of two anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography. One phantom was based off a computational breast model; it was 3D printed by CIRS (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA) under license from the University of Pennsylvania. We investigate how the textural realism of this phantom compares against a phantom derived from an actual patient's mammogram ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI). Images of each phantom were acquired at three kV in 1 kV increments using auto-time technique settings. Acquisitions at each technique setting were repeated twice, resulting in six images per phantom. In the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") images, 341 features were calculated; i.e., gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. Features were also calculated in a negative screening population. For each feature, the middle 95% of the clinical distribution was used to evaluate the textural realism of each phantom. A feature was considered realistic if all six measurements in the phantom were within the middle 95% of the clinical distribution. Otherwise, a feature was considered unrealistic. More features were actually found to be realistic by this definition in the CIRS phantom (305 out of 341 features or 89.44%) than in the phantom derived from a specific patient's.
AB - In this paper, radiomic features are used to validate the textural realism of two anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography. One phantom was based off a computational breast model; it was 3D printed by CIRS (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA) under license from the University of Pennsylvania. We investigate how the textural realism of this phantom compares against a phantom derived from an actual patient's mammogram ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI). Images of each phantom were acquired at three kV in 1 kV increments using auto-time technique settings. Acquisitions at each technique setting were repeated twice, resulting in six images per phantom. In the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") images, 341 features were calculated; i.e., gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. Features were also calculated in a negative screening population. For each feature, the middle 95% of the clinical distribution was used to evaluate the textural realism of each phantom. A feature was considered realistic if all six measurements in the phantom were within the middle 95% of the clinical distribution. Otherwise, a feature was considered unrealistic. More features were actually found to be realistic by this definition in the CIRS phantom (305 out of 341 features or 89.44%) than in the phantom derived from a specific patient's.
KW - Anthropomorphic phantom
KW - Digital mammography
KW - Image acquisition
KW - Radiomics
KW - X-ray imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086138636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.2564363
DO - 10.1117/12.2564363
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85086138636
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020
A2 - Bosmans, Hilde
A2 - Marshall, Nicholas
A2 - Van Ongeval, Chantal
PB - SPIE
T2 - 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020
Y2 - 25 May 2020 through 27 May 2020
ER -