TY - GEN
T1 - Calculation of radiomic features to validate the textural realism of physical anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography
AU - Acciavatti, Raymond J.
AU - Cohen, Eric A.
AU - Haji Maghsoudi, Omid
AU - Gastounioti, Aimilia
AU - Pantalone, Lauren
AU - Hsieh, Meng Kang
AU - Barufaldi, Bruno
AU - Bakic, Predrag R.
AU - Chen, Jinbo
AU - Conant, Emily F.
AU - Kontos, Despina
AU - Maidment, Andrew D.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 SPIE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this paper, radiomic features are used to validate the textural realism of two anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography. One phantom was based off a computational breast model; it was 3D printed by CIRS (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA) under license from the University of Pennsylvania. We investigate how the textural realism of this phantom compares against a phantom derived from an actual patient's mammogram ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI). Images of each phantom were acquired at three kV in 1 kV increments using auto-time technique settings. Acquisitions at each technique setting were repeated twice, resulting in six images per phantom. In the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") images, 341 features were calculated; i.e., gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. Features were also calculated in a negative screening population. For each feature, the middle 95% of the clinical distribution was used to evaluate the textural realism of each phantom. A feature was considered realistic if all six measurements in the phantom were within the middle 95% of the clinical distribution. Otherwise, a feature was considered unrealistic. More features were actually found to be realistic by this definition in the CIRS phantom (305 out of 341 features or 89.44%) than in the phantom derived from a specific patient's.
AB - In this paper, radiomic features are used to validate the textural realism of two anthropomorphic phantoms for digital mammography. One phantom was based off a computational breast model; it was 3D printed by CIRS (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA) under license from the University of Pennsylvania. We investigate how the textural realism of this phantom compares against a phantom derived from an actual patient's mammogram ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI). Images of each phantom were acquired at three kV in 1 kV increments using auto-time technique settings. Acquisitions at each technique setting were repeated twice, resulting in six images per phantom. In the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") images, 341 features were calculated; i.e., gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. Features were also calculated in a negative screening population. For each feature, the middle 95% of the clinical distribution was used to evaluate the textural realism of each phantom. A feature was considered realistic if all six measurements in the phantom were within the middle 95% of the clinical distribution. Otherwise, a feature was considered unrealistic. More features were actually found to be realistic by this definition in the CIRS phantom (305 out of 341 features or 89.44%) than in the phantom derived from a specific patient's.
KW - Anthropomorphic phantom
KW - Digital mammography
KW - Image acquisition
KW - Radiomics
KW - X-ray imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086138636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.2564363
DO - 10.1117/12.2564363
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85086138636
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020
A2 - Bosmans, Hilde
A2 - Marshall, Nicholas
A2 - Van Ongeval, Chantal
PB - SPIE
T2 - 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging, IWBI 2020
Y2 - 25 May 2020 through 27 May 2020
ER -