TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief Report
T2 - Understanding Preferences for HIV Care among Patients Experiencing Homelessness or Unstable Housing: A Discrete Choice Experiment
AU - Conte, Madellena
AU - Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid
AU - Geng, Elvin
AU - Imbert, Elizabeth
AU - Hickey, Matthew D.
AU - Havlir, Diane
AU - Gandhi, Monica
AU - Clemenzi-Allen, Angelo
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by an Ending the HIV Epidemic Supplemental grant from the National Institutes of Health to the UCSF-Gladstone Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI027763). This publication/presentation/grant proposal was made possible with help from an Ending the HIV Epidemic supplement to the UCSF-Gladstone Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH-funded program (P30 AI027763).
Funding Information:
ACA received support from an NIH T32AI060530-12. E.G. received support from an NIH K24 AI134413. The “Ward 86” HIV program in the Division of HIV, ID, and Global Medicine received an unrestricted investigator-initiated grant from the Gilead Foundation to support implementation and evaluation of the “POP-UP” program, a clinical program for PLWH experiencing HUH (Grant No. IN-US-985-5691). Gilead had no role in the interpretation or presentation of these results. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - Background:Homelessness and unstable housing (HUH) negatively impact care outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH). To inform the design of a clinic program for PLWH experiencing HUH, we quantified patient preferences and trade-offs across multiple HIV-service domains using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).Methods:We sequentially sampled PLWH experiencing HUH presenting at an urban HIV clinic with ≥1 missed primary care visit and viremia in the last year to conduct a DCE. Participants chose between 2 hypothetical clinics varying across 5 service attributes: care team "get to know me as a person" versus not; receiving $10, $15, or $20 gift cards for clinic visits; drop-in versus scheduled visits; direct phone communication to care team versus front-desk staff; and staying 2 versus 20 blocks from the clinic. We estimated attribute relative utility (ie, preference) using mixed-effects logistic regression and calculated the monetary trade-off of preferred options.Results:Among 65 individuals interviewed, 61% were >40 years old, 45% White, 77% men, 25% heterosexual, 56% lived outdoors/emergency housing, and 44% in temporary housing. Strongest preferences were for patient-centered care team [β = 3.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.57 to 5.02] and drop-in clinic appointments (β = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.80), with a willingness to trade $32.79 (95% CI: 14.75 to 50.81) and $11.45 (95% CI: 2.95 to 19.95) in gift cards/visit, respectively.Conclusions:In this DCE, PLWH experiencing HUH were willing to trade significant financial gain to have a personal relationship with and drop-in access to their care team rather than more resource-intensive services. These findings informed Ward 86's "POP-UP" program for PLWH-HUH and can inform "ending the HIV epidemic" efforts.
AB - Background:Homelessness and unstable housing (HUH) negatively impact care outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH). To inform the design of a clinic program for PLWH experiencing HUH, we quantified patient preferences and trade-offs across multiple HIV-service domains using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).Methods:We sequentially sampled PLWH experiencing HUH presenting at an urban HIV clinic with ≥1 missed primary care visit and viremia in the last year to conduct a DCE. Participants chose between 2 hypothetical clinics varying across 5 service attributes: care team "get to know me as a person" versus not; receiving $10, $15, or $20 gift cards for clinic visits; drop-in versus scheduled visits; direct phone communication to care team versus front-desk staff; and staying 2 versus 20 blocks from the clinic. We estimated attribute relative utility (ie, preference) using mixed-effects logistic regression and calculated the monetary trade-off of preferred options.Results:Among 65 individuals interviewed, 61% were >40 years old, 45% White, 77% men, 25% heterosexual, 56% lived outdoors/emergency housing, and 44% in temporary housing. Strongest preferences were for patient-centered care team [β = 3.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.57 to 5.02] and drop-in clinic appointments (β = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.80), with a willingness to trade $32.79 (95% CI: 14.75 to 50.81) and $11.45 (95% CI: 2.95 to 19.95) in gift cards/visit, respectively.Conclusions:In this DCE, PLWH experiencing HUH were willing to trade significant financial gain to have a personal relationship with and drop-in access to their care team rather than more resource-intensive services. These findings informed Ward 86's "POP-UP" program for PLWH-HUH and can inform "ending the HIV epidemic" efforts.
KW - Discrete choice experiment
KW - HIV
KW - Homelessness and unstable housing
KW - Retention in care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095385496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002476
DO - 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002476
M3 - Article
C2 - 33136742
AN - SCOPUS:85095385496
SN - 1525-4135
VL - 85
SP - 444
EP - 449
JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
IS - 4
ER -