TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridging therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma
T2 - results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium
AU - Jain, Michael D.
AU - Jacobs, Miriam T.
AU - Gao, Feng
AU - Nastoupil, Loretta J.
AU - Spiegel, Jay Y.
AU - Lin, Yi
AU - Dahiya, Saurabh
AU - Lunning, Matthew
AU - Lekakis, Lazaros
AU - Reagan, Patrick
AU - Oluwole, Olalekan
AU - McGuirk, Joseph
AU - Deol, Abhinav
AU - Sehgal, Alison R.
AU - Goy, Andre
AU - Hill, Brian T.
AU - Andreadis, Charalambos
AU - Munoz, Javier
AU - Chavez, Julio C.
AU - Bennani, N. Nora
AU - Rapoport, Aaron P.
AU - Vose, Julie M.
AU - Miklos, David
AU - Neelapu, Sattva S.
AU - Locke, Frederick L.
AU - Ghobadi, Armin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology.
PY - 2024/2/27
Y1 - 2024/2/27
N2 - During the manufacturing period of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, patients may experience a decline in their condition due to cancer progression. In this study, we investigated the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received antilymphoma treatment between leukapheresis and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion. We conducted our analysis using data from the multicenter US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, with a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4.3-42.1). Out of the 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 patients received axi-cel. A total 52% of patients (n = 143) who received BT had a higher baseline risk profile than patients who did not receive BT, and these patients, as a group, had inferior outcomes compared with those who did not receive BT. However, after propensity score matching between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in overall response rate (77% vs 87%; P = .13), complete response rate (58% vs 70%; P = .1), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; P = .23), and overall survival (HR, 1.39; P=.09) between the BT group and the no-BT group, respectively. Analyzing the effects of BT in the whole cohort that underwent leukapheresis regardless of receiving axi-cel (intention-to-treat analysis) showed similar results. Radiation BT resulted in outcomes similar to those observed with nonradiation BT. Our findings suggest that BT may be safe without a significant impact on long-term survival for patients who require disease stabilization during the manufacturing period. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no clear advantage to using radiation-based BT over nonradiation-based BT.
AB - During the manufacturing period of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, patients may experience a decline in their condition due to cancer progression. In this study, we investigated the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received antilymphoma treatment between leukapheresis and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) infusion. We conducted our analysis using data from the multicenter US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, with a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4.3-42.1). Out of the 298 patients who underwent leukapheresis, 275 patients received axi-cel. A total 52% of patients (n = 143) who received BT had a higher baseline risk profile than patients who did not receive BT, and these patients, as a group, had inferior outcomes compared with those who did not receive BT. However, after propensity score matching between the 2 groups, there were no statistically significant differences in overall response rate (77% vs 87%; P = .13), complete response rate (58% vs 70%; P = .1), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; P = .23), and overall survival (HR, 1.39; P=.09) between the BT group and the no-BT group, respectively. Analyzing the effects of BT in the whole cohort that underwent leukapheresis regardless of receiving axi-cel (intention-to-treat analysis) showed similar results. Radiation BT resulted in outcomes similar to those observed with nonradiation BT. Our findings suggest that BT may be safe without a significant impact on long-term survival for patients who require disease stabilization during the manufacturing period. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no clear advantage to using radiation-based BT over nonradiation-based BT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186749468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011489
DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011489
M3 - Article
C2 - 38051550
AN - SCOPUS:85186749468
SN - 2473-9529
VL - 8
SP - 1042
EP - 1050
JO - Blood Advances
JF - Blood Advances
IS - 4
ER -