Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium

Emily F. Conant, Elisabeth F. Beaber, Brian L. Sprague, Sally D. Herschorn, Donald L. Weaver, Tracy Onega, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Anne Marie McCarthy, Steven P. Poplack, Jennifer S. Haas, Katrina Armstrong, Mitchell D. Schnall, William E. Barlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

156 Scopus citations

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is emerging as the new standard of care for breast cancer screening based on improved cancer detection coupled with reductions in recall compared to screening with digital mammography (DM) alone. However, many prior studies lack follow-up data to assess false negatives examinations. The purpose of this study is to assess if DBT is associated with improved screening outcomes based on follow-up data from tumor registries or pathology. Retrospective analysis of prospective cohort data from three research centers performing DBT screening in the PROSPR consortium from 2011 to 2014 was performed. Recall and biopsy rates were assessed from 198,881 women age 40–74 years undergoing screening (142,883 DM and 55,998 DBT examinations). Cancer, cancer detection, and false negative rates and positive predictive values were assessed on examinations with one year of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to compare DBT to DM adjusting for research center, age, prior breast imaging, and breast density. There was a reduction in recall with DBT compared to DM (8.7 vs. 10.4 %, p < 0.0001), with adjusted OR = 0.68 (95 % CI = 0.65–0.71). DBT demonstrated a statistically significant increase in cancer detection over DM (5.9 vs. 4.4/1000 screened, adjusted OR = 1.45, 95 % CI = 1.12–1.88), an improvement in PPV1 (6.4 % for DBT vs. 4.1 % for DM, adjusted OR = 2.02, 95 % CI = 1.54–2.65), and no significant difference in false negative rates for DBT compared to DM (0.46 vs. 0.60/1000 screened, p = 0.347). Our data support implementation of DBT screening based on increased cancer detection, reduced recall, and no difference in false negative screening examinations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-116
Number of pages8
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume156
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • Breast cancer screening
  • Digital breast tomosynthesis
  • Mammography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this